Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hollingsworth, 106 So. 662.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. B. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Additionally, -40, 106 So.
State v. Davis 822 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Additionally, -40 , 106 So.
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
(La.1982), wherein the Supreme Court further noted that notwithstanding the general rule against leading questions, the matter is largely within the discretion of the trial court and in the absence of palpable abuse of that discretion resulting in prejudice to the accused, a finding of reversible error is not warranted, , 106 So.
State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
State v. Francis, supra ; , 106 So.
State v. Haynes 339 So. 2d 328 La. 1976
State v. Francis 337 So. 2d 487 La. 1976
State v. Moorcraft 319 So. 2d 386 La. 1975
In support of this position, , 106 So.
State v. Fallon 290 So. 2d 273 La. 1974
State v. Fulmer 270 So. 2d 116 La. 1972
State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
State v. Sheffield 93 So. 2d 691 La. 1957
State v. Labat 75 So. 2d 333 La. 1954
State v. Fuller 114 So. 606 La. 1927
State v. Beale 113 So. 546 La. 1927
State v. Malone 112 So. 404 La. 1927
State v. Thompson 108 So. 543 La. 1926
State v. *301 Hollingsworth, , 106 So.
Jones v. City of New Orleans 107 So. 476 La. 1926
Manifestly, where the law grants a right, it grants the substance of the thing granted, and not the mere form thereof, for it is'not to be presumed that the law “intended to extend a barren right” , 160 La.