Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Laporte v. North American Acc. Ins. Co., 109 So. 767.
- Robertson v. Cumis Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
-
Allstate Insurance v. Montalbano
335 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Insurance Co., , 109 So.
- Chateau v. Smith 297 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
- Elledge v. Warren 263 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
- Prestenback v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 257 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
-
Guillory v. Deshotel
251 So. 2d 91
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Insurance Company, , 109 So.
-
Thibodeaux v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
242 So. 2d 112
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
This interpretation is in accord with the definition of the term "Motorcycle" , 109 So.
- Labove v. Traders & General Insurance Company 219 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
- Robinson v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co. 10 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Clesi v. National Life Accident Ins. Co. 197 So. 413 La. 1940
- Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 192 So. 72 La. 1939
- Womack v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee 184 So. 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Brown v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. 146 So. 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
-
Seelhorst v. PontcharTrain R. R.
123 So. 626
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
931 , , a case involving damage' to an automobile at a crossing where there were four tracks covering a space of 35 feet (in this case there were five tracks covering about 52 feet): “The trial judge found, and the evidence supports the finding, that the engineer could have seen the hearse approaching the crossing, and abou
-
Collins v. Life & Casualty Insurance
8 La. App. 332
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
It is very clear from the above provisions of the policy that the insured was not protected from accidents generally and that the liability of the insurer was restricted to injuries received in the accidents which might occur to the insured as expressed in the policy (Laporte vs. North Ameri *333 can Insurance Co., , 109 So.