No. 27584.
Precedential
Processed
State v. Hughes
State v. Hughes, 106 So. 566 (La. 1925).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Gebbia 121 La. 1083
- State v. Pullen 130 La. 249
- Denegre v. W. G. Tebault Furniture & Realty Co. 130 La. 283
- State ex rel. McMahon v. Sanders 57 So. 927
- State v. Abrams 151 La. 623
Opinion text
BRUNOT, J. The appellant was indicted, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced for selling intoxicating liquor in violation of the Hood Act (Act No. 39 of Ex.'Sess. 1921). From conviction and sentence he appealed. There are no bills of exception in the record, no assignments of error, no error patent on the face of the record, and appellant has not filed a brief. Therefore nothing is presented for our consideration. State v. Gebbia, 121 La. 1083 , 47 So. 32 ; State v. Pullen, 130 La. 249 , 57 So. 906 ; State v. William, 130 La. 283 , 57 So. 927 ; State v. Abrams, 151 La. 623 , 92 So. 138 . The verdict, judgment, and' sentence are affirmed.