Smith v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., March 12, 1962 139 So. 2d 277; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 13, 1961 127 So. 2d 764; La., October 15, 1890 42 La. 945; La., July 15, 1871 23 La. Ann. 606
Smith v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance, 130 So. 2d 775 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Honeycutt v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co. 130 So. 2d 770
Opinion text
SAVOY, Judge. This action is a companion suit and was consolidated with the case of Honeycutt v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co. et al., 130 So.2d 770 . The facts of the case are fully set forth in the case of Honeycutt v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co., supra. Counsel for plaintiff has answered the appeal and asked that the award granted by the trial judge of $10,000 be increased. An examination of the cases of our appellate courts on quantum reveals that the award made by the trial judge was proper under the facts found in this case. For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Defendant, T. J. Stephens, as administrator of the Succession of Thomas Arthur Stephens, is to pay all costs of this suit. Affirmed. On Application for Rehearing. En Banc. Rehearing denied.