Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Peter v. Stanga, 109 So. 783.
- Bellett v. Brinson 206 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- State ex rel. Bannister v. Bannister 198 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
-
State Ex Rel. Eastham v. Traylor
29 So. 2d 43
La. 1946
Peter v. Stanga, et ux., , 109 So.
- State Ex Rel. Guinn v. Watson 26 So. 2d 740 La. 1946
- State Ex Rel. Mims v. Parker 7 So. 2d 706 La. 1942
-
State Ex Rel. Landry v. Robin
192 So. 349
La. 1939
page 978, ; this court affirmed the district court, in the exercise of such reasonable latitude, in' the following language: “We think the exceptional features of this case remove it from the grasp of the codal articles and decisions relied upon by relator.
- State Ex Rel. Castillion v. Jeunesse 171 So. 51 La. 1936
- State Ex Rel. Burleigh v. Savoie 171 So. 98 La. 1936
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. McCall 168 So. 291 La. 1936
- State Ex Rel. Castille v. Cooke 164 So. 153 La. 1935
- State Ex Rel. Pitre v. Lefort 155 So. 435 La. 1934
-
State Ex Rel. Stockstill v. Spiers
128 So. 275
La. 1930
Peter v.' Stanga, , 109 So.
- Davis v. Willis 124 So. 129 La. 1929
-
Texada v. Spence
118 So. 120
La. 1928
977 , , this court said: “Concubinage is the act or practice of cohabiting in sexual intercourse without the authority of law or legal marriage.” If one of the parties in good faith lives with the other under the solemn sanction of what purports to be a legal marriage, though the marriage be null, as to the party in good fa