Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co., 108 So. 314.

23 citing documents.

  • Edmundson Bros. Partnership v. Montex Drilling Co. 672 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Acquisitions, Inc. v. Frontier Explorations, Inc. 432 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    15 (1931); cf, , 108 So.
  • Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. O'BIER 201 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
  • Landry v. Flaitz 157 So. 2d 892 La. 1963
  • Lelong v. Richardson 126 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Reagan v. Murphy 105 So. 2d 210 La. 1958
    See Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co., Inc., , 108 So.
  • Melancon v. Texas Company 89 So. 2d 135 La. 1956
    254 , ], we pointed out that this Court has consistently held that “ * * * ‘the main consideration of such a lease is the development of the land for oil and gas and that the lessee must either develop with reasonable diligence, or give up the lease’ ”, quoting from Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co., Inc., , 108 So.
  • Wier v. Grubb 82 So. 2d 1 La. 1955
    This court has consistently held that: “ * * * the main consideration of such a lease is the development of the land for oil and gas and that the lessee must either develop with reasonable diligence, or give up the lease.” Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co., Inc., , 108 So.
  • Logan v. Blaxton 71 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
  • Noel Estate, Inc. v. Murray 65 So. 2d 886 La. 1953
    Caldwell v. Alton Oil Company, Inc., , 108 So.
  • Taylor v. Kimbell 54 So. 2d 1 La. 1951
  • Vance v. Hurley 41 So. 2d 724 La. 1949
    In support of their position the plaintiffs rely on the decisions of this court in the cases of Caldwell v. Alton Oil Company, Inc., , 108 So.
  • Wier v. Grubb 41 So. 2d 846 La. 1949
    orted in the case of Kyle et al. v. Wadley et al., D.C., 24 F. Supp. 884, 887 , by the statement that “ * * * if the property has, as contended by defendants in their pleadings, been fully developed,” there can be “no justification in permitting them to hold on to this large tract of land without further activity, and they should surrender it.” We find a , 108 So.
  • Gennuso v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. 14 So. 2d 445 La. 1943
    He also cited Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co., Inc., , 108 So.
  • Wadkins v. Wilson Oil Corporation 6 So. 2d 720 La. 1942
    “ ‘A development that falls short of a reasonable production which would bring a net profit to the lessee and furnish an adequate consideration to the lessor for the continuance of the lease might well be said to be no development at all within the contemplation of the parties.’ , 108 So.
  • Risinger v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. 3 So. 2d 289 La. 1941
  • Parten v. Webb 1 So. 2d 76 La. 1941
    15 ; , at page 146, 108 So.
  • Logan v. Tholl Oil Co. 180 So. 473 La. 1938
    "A development that falls short of a' reasonable production which would bring a net profit to the lessee and furnish an adequate consideration to the lessor for the continuance of the lease might well be said to be no development at all within the contemplation of the parties.” , 108 So.
  • Temple v. Lindsay 161 So. 8 La. 1935
  • Pace Lake Gas Co. v. United Carbon Co. 148 So. 699 La. 1933
  • Smith v. Sun Oil Co. 135 So. 15 La. 1931
  • Stubbs v. Imperial Oil & Gas Products Co. 114 So. 595 La. 1927
  • Houston v. Highland Oil Co. 6 La. App. 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    The evidence shows why Barr can operate the wells at a profit is the same as was the case in Caldwell vs. Alton Oil Co., , 108 South.