Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite James v. Spence & Goldstein, Inc., 109 So. 917.

20 citing documents.

Jones v. New Orleans Furniture Mfg. Co. 17 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
In Re Westwego Moss Co. 198 So. 893 La. 1940
Harris v. Southern Carbon Co. 182 So. 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
1, § 8 of the statute, as amended by section 1, of Act No. 247 of 1920, which provided that for the loss of a hand the period of compensation should be 150 weeks, citing in support of its position the decision in James v. Spence & Goldstein, Inc., , 109 So.
McGruder v. Service Drayage Co. 162 So. 806 La. 1935
The Court of Appeal followed the ruling of this court in the case of James v. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
Barr v. Davis Bros. Lumber Co. 161 So. 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
412 ; James v. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
McGruder v. Service Drayage Co. 158 So. 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
1109 , , was decided, subsection (d) was held to be inapplicable in a disability case.
Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co. 156 So. 412 La. 1934
“It was held in the leading case of James v. Spence & Goldstein, 161 La, 1108, , where an injury to the fingers caused a temporary loss of the use of a hand, that though compensation was allowable under section 8, subd.
Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co. 151 So. 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
It was held in the leading case of James v. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
Wilson v. Union Indemnity Co. 150 So. 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
1109 , , was decided, subsection (d) was held to be inapt-plicable in a disability case.
Sizemore v. Kirkland Timber Co. 131 So. 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
James v. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
Dykes v. Ruddle 128 So. 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
agraph 14, reads: “A permanent total loss of the use of a member is equivalent to the amputation of the member.” And subparagraph 13 provides that: “An amputation between the knee and the ankle shall be equivalent to the loss of a foot.” The compensation for the loss of a foot is “65% of wages during one hundred twenty-five weeks.” Under the holding in the case of James v. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
Joseph v. Higgins Lumber Co. 126 So. 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
* * * ” These subparagraphs have been interpreted by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in James vs. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
O'Donnell v. Fortuna Oil Co. 120 So. 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
compensation should not have been fixed for a period exceeding one hundred fifty weeks, under paragraph (5), clause (d), subsection 1, section 8 of the statute, as amended by section 1 of Act 247 of 1920, which provided that for the loss of a hand the period of compensation should be one hundred fifty weeks, citing in support of its position the decision in James vs. Spence & Goldstein, Inc., , 109 So.
Hargis v. McWilliams Co. 119 So. 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
James vs. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
Stokes v. E. Sondheimer Co. 8 La. App. 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Rodriguez v. Standard Oil Co. 117 So. 269 La. 1928
538 ; James v. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
Wolf v. Louisiana Milk Products Co. 8 La. App. 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
In James vs. Spence & Goldstein, , 109 So.
Naremore v. Caddo-Desoto Cotton Oil Co. 7 La. App. 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Counsel for plaintiff argues that this case falls under the ruling in the case of James vs. Spence & Goldstein, Inc., , 109 So.
LeBlanc v. Ohio Oil Co. 7 La. App. 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
dicate the injury has resulted or will result in plaintiff’s limb being an impediment to his ability to- work or that he will not recover the full use of his limb, and it appearing that the sole cause of his disability is the injury to his limb, the period of compensation should not be longer than would be allowed for loss of the limb, or two hundred weeks (James vs. Spence & Goldstein, Inc., , 109 South.
Cater v. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. 6 La. App. 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
This case, in our opinion, falls squarely Within the holding of the Supreme Court *502 in the case of James vs. Spence & Goldstein, Inc., , 109 South.