DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, 108 So. 791.

19 citing documents.

  • Boxie v. Smith-Ruffin 979 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    D'Hemecourt Petroleum, supra, , 108 So.
  • Prator v. Caddo Parish 865 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    In Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Johnson v. T & LNAS/Domino Sugar 854 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Smith v. Doe 786 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Stipulations between the parties in a specific case are binding on the trial court when not in derogation of law.” , 108 So.
  • Landry v. Landry 724 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    In Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Owens v. Anderson 631 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Sherman v. K.D. Auger Trucking, Inc. 607 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    In Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Mobley v. Harrel 571 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Comberrel v. Basford 550 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    The Fourth Circuit noted the difference between agreements affecting the powers, duties, and prerogatives of the court, which will not be upheld, and agreements between the parties affecting their own rights and duties, which will be upheld, citing Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Levet v. Calais & Sons, Inc. 514 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • RJ D'HEMECOURT PETROLEUM v. McNamara 444 So. 2d 600 La. 1983
  • Adam v. Southern Tours, Inc. 431 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    But in his answers to a second set of interrogatories filed in the record, plaintiff specifically indicates that those injuries were “not attributable to accident at bar.” In Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, our Supreme Court found that stipulations between the parties in a specific case were binding upon the trial court in the disposition of that case, where the stipulations were not in derogation of the law.
  • Fischer v. Travelers Ins. Co. 429 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    In Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Lockett v. Home Insurance Co. 413 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • General Inv., Inc. v. Thomas 400 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    The leading case on this point is Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , (1926).
  • Hair v. City of Baton Rouge 297 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Champ Auto Sales, Inc. v. Savoy 207 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    649 , (1955); Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperrier, , 108 So.
  • Placid Oil Company v. AM Dupont Corporation 156 So. 2d 444 La. 1963
  • Wickliffe v. Cooper & Sperier 120 So. 52 La. 1928
    This agreement gave rise to another case, bearing the same title, but which is not pertinent here, namely, , 108 So.