DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Barker v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co., 112 So. 415.

15 citing documents.

  • Michael McCallon v. Key Energy Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry 603 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    While we recognize that the Supreme Court is the exclusive and final arbiter of its own decrees and judgments, , 112 So.
  • Savoie v. Savoy 262 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Bowie v. Bowie 228 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. La Bauve 72 So. 2d 865 La. 1954
    had been placed in the hands of the sheriff, and which extinguished the judgment.” In support of their appeal to this Court, , 112 So.
  • Vives v. Vives 67 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    See also the following pertinent authorities : , 112 So.
  • Levy v. Stephens 54 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Each of the parties must pay the witnesses summoned by them respectively beyond that number.” This article was applied, as written, in Barker v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Company, Inc., , 112 So.
  • Cannella v. Succession of Cannella 43 So. 2d 795 La. 1949
    555 ; Barker v. Houssiere & Latreille Oil Co., , 112 So.
  • Jiles v. Venus Community Benev. Aid Ass'n 195 So. 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    the Supreme Court quoted with approval what the court of appeal had said: “The ascertainment of the amount of costs incurred in a cause, and the taxation thereof against the party cast, is but an incident of the suit, which necessarily falls within the authority of the court having jurisdiction of the case in which such proceedings are instituted.” In Barker v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co., Inc., , 112 So.
  • McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation 190 So. 391 La. 1939
  • Nash v. Lococo 182 So. 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Barker v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Company, Inc., , 112 So.
  • Crichton v. Krouse 150 So. 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    The question of her owing them and having to pay them was decided by the final judgment against her.” , 112 So.
  • Naef v. Miller-Goll Mfg. Co. 143 So. 61 La. 1932
  • Sherwood v. Ticheli 125 So. 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
    On the first point, the case must be determined adversely to appellee’s contentions on the authority of Barker vs. Houssiere Latreille Oil Company, , 112 So.
  • Bergeron v. Babin 125 So. 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
    Plaintiffs in brief seem to rely on the case of Barker vs. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co., , 112 So.