DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Klein v. Young, 111 So. 495.

65 citing documents.

  • Brown v. Pons 147 So. 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    59 , , the Supreme .Court of Louisiana approved the doctrine that: “ * * * The obligation imposed upon the owner of a building to answer in damages to a person injured by neglect of the owner to keep his building in repair arises ex.
  • Chutz v. Bergeron 147 So. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
  • Herbert v. Herrlitz 146 So. 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    hese articles: " * ⅜ * The obligation imposed upon the owner of a building to answer in damages to a person injured by neglect of the owner to keep his building in repair arises ex delicto, and * * * the right of action, being in tort, is in favor of one who is injured while lawfully on the premises or inside of the building as well as in favor of neighbors and passers-by.” , 111 So.
  • Thompson v. Moran 140 So. 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
    670, 2315, 2322, 2693-2695; , 111 So.
  • Bell v. First Nat. Life Ins. 138 So. 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    Her age and her injuries are about the same as the age and the injuries of Mrs. Klein, , 111 So.
  • Divas v. Noto 134 So. 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
  • Stumpf v. Baronne Building, Inc. 135 So. 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
  • Vanosby v. Creidman 131 So. 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
  • Richard v. Tarantino 131 So. 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    ed, and it is now held: “That the obligation imposed upon the owner of a building to answer in damages to a person injured by neglect of the owner to keep his building in repair arises ex delicto, and that the right of action, being in tort, is in favor of one who, is injured while lawfully on the premises or inside of the building as well as in favor of neighbors and passers-by.” , 111 So.
  • Price v. Florsheim 127 So. 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    Code, art. 2322, to answer in damages to person injured by neglect of owner to keep building in repair, arises ex delicto.” Klein vs. Young, , 111 So.
  • Gardiner v. De Salles 126 So. 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    lease without the written consent of the lessor, and that the lease contained a provision that the owner, as lessor, would not be responsible for damages caused by any vice or defects unless in case of positive failure to remedy same after written notice, and that lessee, Galiano, was responsible for the damages which plaintiff might have suffered are fully covered by the case of Klein vs. Young, , 111 So.
  • Grundmann v. Trocchiano 125 So. 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
    As to the question of the responsibility or obligation placed upon a subtenant by stipulations in the lease between the landlord and main tenant, we find the case of Klein vs. Young, , 111 So.
  • Viola v. Convery 122 So. 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
    Klein vs. Young, , 111 So.
  • Liddell v. Lex 8 La. App. 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
    In the case of Klein vs. Young, , 111 So.
  • Williams v. White 7 La. App. 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
    Klein vs. Young, 163, p. 59, .