Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 4, 1967 204 So. 2d 429; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 6, 1926 5 La. App. 735; La., April 15, 1873 25 La. Ann. 353
Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert, 227 So. 2d 615 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969).
Cited by
- Exxon Pipeline Co. v. LeBlanc 763 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Fruge 227 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Fruge 229 So. 2d 733 La. 1970
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert 229 So. 2d 733 La. 1970
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Fruge 227 So. 2d 606
Opinion text
CULPEPPER, Judge. For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Eula Mae Fruge, La. App. 227 So.2d 606 , the judgment appealed is amended to (1) reduce the award to Elroy Hebert to $4,561.00 and (2) delete the limitations on the servitude designated as G-l through G^6. Except for these amendments, the judgment is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendant. Affirmed, as amended. ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING Before TATE, FRUGE, SAVOY, HOOD and CULPEPPER, JJ. PER CURIAM. For the reasons assigned in the per curiam denial of defendant’s application for a rehearing in the companion case, Michigan-Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Eula Mae Fruge, 227 So.2d 606 , our original decision herein is amended to increase the award to Elroy Hebert to $4795 and the application for rehearing is denied. TATE, J., dissents. The reasons assigned in No. 2788 (Frugé), 227 So.2d 606 . FRUGÉ, J., votes for rehearing.