Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thompson v. Kivett Reel, 25 So. 2d 124.
-
Shaw v. Scott
585 So. 2d 623
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, (La.App.
-
Honeycutt v. Town of Boyce
327 So. 2d 154
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, (La.App.
-
Trask v. Lewis
258 So. 2d 603
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Defendant, however, relies on the rule expressed by us in the case of Thompson v. Kivett and Reel, Inc., (La.App.
-
Carney v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
250 So. 2d 776
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
App., ; Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, Inc., La.App., .
-
Office Center, Inc. v. Tanenbaum
225 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
App.lst Cir. 1966); Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, (La.App.
-
Cleveland v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.
222 So. 2d 644
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
419 (2nd Cir. 1940); Blades v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., (1st Cir. 1957); Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, Inc., La.App., (1st Cir. 1946); Williams v. Robison, La.App., (1st Cir. 1957).
-
Bonnecaze v. Hamrick
221 So. 2d 638
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Thompson v. Kivett & Reel
-
Brooks v. Fondren
199 So. 2d 588
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
App., 1 Cir., 1946), ; and Fortenberry v. Clay (La.App., 1 Cir., 1953), .
-
Thigpen v. Guarisco
197 So. 2d 904
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
2 Cir., 1940); Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, (La.App.
-
Sellers v. Continental Oil Company
168 So. 2d 435
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
App., , and Williams v. Marionneaux, 240 La.
-
Long v. Globe Indemnity Co.
144 So. 2d 275
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Co., La.App., ; Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, La.App., .” The plea of res judicata filed on behalf of the Globe Indemnity Company, defendant herein, should have been sustained.
-
Darensbourg v. Columbia Casualty Company
140 So. 2d 241
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, La.App., and cases cited therein.
-
Hornsby v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford
128 So. 2d 280
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
713 , ; Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, La.App., , and others which hold that one accident gives rise to but one cause of action and that the cause of action cannot be split.
-
Moak v. American Automobile Insurance Co.
127 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
419 ; Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, La.App., .
-
Tooke v. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Co.
122 So. 2d 109
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Co., La.App., ; Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, La.App., .
- McDaniel v. Audubon Insurance Company 121 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
-
Blades v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.
95 So. 2d 209
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
The decision of the Lower Court was based on the decision of this Court in Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, Inc., *211 , wherein, under a similar situation, we held that a party who was able to read and write is charged with having read that which he could easily have read, and in which case we upheld the act of release.
-
Fortenberry v. Clay
68 So. 2d 133
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
666 ; and Thompson v. Kivett & Reel, Inc., La.App., .