Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Presbyterian Hospital v. Bacon, 115 So. 618.

19 citing documents.

In RE SUCCESSIONS OF JOHNSON v. Williams 387 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Matter of Succession of Jones 369 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Carter v. Succession of Carter 332 So. 2d 439 La. 1976
Succession of Stewart 301 So. 2d 872 La. 1974
Adhering to this maxim, we stated in , 115 So.
Succession of Stewart 287 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Typical of these cases is the , 115 So.
Succession of Dinwiddie 263 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Typical of these cases is the , 115 So.
Succession of Mulqueeny 181 So. 2d 384 La. 1965
842 , , the Court said: “The true rule in the interpretation of testaments is that ‘the intention of the testator must principally be endeavored to be ascertained, without departing, however, from the proper signification of the terms of the testament.’ Civil Code, Article 1712; , 115 So.
Succession of Brown 146 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Succession of Van Baast 140 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Typical of these cases is the , 115 So.
Condon v. McCormick 134 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Succession of Formby 127 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Succession of Elliott 111 So. 2d 344 La. 1959
Succession of Gurganus 20 So. 2d 296 La. 1944
He cites Article 1700 of the Revised Civil Code and , 115 So.
Succession of Gurganus 20 So. 2d 296 La. 1944
He cites Article 1700 of the Revised Civil Code and , 115 So.
Succession of Lacoume 17 So. 2d 726 La. 1944
They must be read along with the recognition of that controlling principle, and be construed in subordination to it.’ ” , 115 So.
Succession of Price 13 So. 2d 240 La. 1943
*850 The true rule in the interpretation of testaments is that “the intention of the testator must principally be endeavored to be ascertained, without departing, however, from the proper signification of the terms of the testament.” Civil Code, Article 1712; , 115 So.
Tomlinson v. Thurmon 181 So. 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Succession of Purkert 167 So. 444 La. 1936
Succession of Breaux 143 So. 246 La. 1932