Fruge v. Aetna Insurance Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 4, 1967 205 So. 2d 85; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 28, 1927 5 La. App. 444; La., May 15, 1872 24 La. Ann. 437
Fruge v. Aetna Insurance Co., 225 So. 2d 653 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Fontenot v. Aetna Insurance Company 225 So. 2d 648
Opinion text
TATE, Judge. This is an appeal from summary judgments upholding policy defenses and dismissing three insurers from this tort suit. This proceeding arises out of the same accident and involves the same issues as those decided in a companion appeal this day decided, Mrs. John A. Fontenot v. Aetna Insurance Co., 225 So.2d 648 . For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that companion appeal, we affirm the surance Company, but we reverse the sum-summary judgment dismissing Allstate In-mary judgments dismissing the Aetna Insurance Company and the Continental Casualty Company. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed. The costs of this appeal are to be paid by Aetna and Continental; all other costs to await final disposition of these proceedings. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. On Application for Rehearing. En Banc. Rehearing denied.