DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., 25 So. 2d 104.

20 citing documents.

  • Johnson v. Louisiana State University 417 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    1st Cir. 1976); (La.App.
  • Williams v. Offshore Food Service, Inc. 417 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Smith v. Louisiana Welding Supply Co., Inc. 331 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Richard v. Guillot 271 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Bryant v. Slidell Memorial Hospital 243 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    App., 2d Cir., 1955, (writ denied); Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., 1st Cir., 1946, .” ( 163 So.2d at 857 ) Therefore, the ultimate issue here is whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient corroborating circumstances to support her own testimony as to the occurrence of the accident and provided further that there is nothing to discredit the same.
  • Carter v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 163 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    2d 537 ; France v. City of New Orleans, La.App., Orleans, 1957, ; Roy v. Guillot, La.App., 2d Cir., 1955, (writ denied); Dolhonde v. Gullet Gin Co., La.App., 1st Cir., 1946, .
  • Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    the Court states at page 492: "We concede the proposition urged by learned counsel for plaintiff to the effect that there is precedent in our jurisprudence for the application of the general principle that the testimony of a plaintiff alone is sufficient to make out his case, but only, as was well stated in Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., , 106: `* * * if there is nothing to discredit his (plaintiff's) account of the accident and resulting disability, and his statements are supported by th
  • Gray v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 134 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    App. 1st Cir., 1946, ; Roy v. Guillot, La.App.
  • Sneed v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 126 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    2d Cir., 1949, , 492: “We concede the proposition urged by learned counsel for plaintiff to the effect that there is precedent in our jurisprudence for the application of the general principle that the testimony of a plaintiff alone is sufficient to make out his case, but only, as was well stated in Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., , 106: ‘ * * * if there is nothing to discredit his (plaintiff’s) account of the accident and resulting disability, and his statements are supported by the surro
  • Waters v. LL Brewton Lumber Co. 120 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
  • Broussard v. Dumas Chevrolet Company 120 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    See Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., ; Sims v. Brown Paper Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Johnson v. Andrus, La.App., ; Zito v. Standard Accident Insurance Co., La.App., ; Touchet v. Co
  • Montgomery v. Walter Kellogg Lumber Co. 120 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Roy v. Guillot, La.App., ; Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • Card v. Southern Builders, Inc. 117 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Wherland v. Crowell Long Leaf Lumber Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • France v. City of New Orleans 92 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Wherland v. Crowell Long Leaf Lumber Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • Holmes v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 91 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O’Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .” There are many other cases in our jurispruden
  • Roy v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance 87 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Tate v. Gullett Gin Company & Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 86 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Roy v. Guillot 84 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • Zito v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 76 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De NeMours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O'Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .
  • Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana 43 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , 106: "* * * if there is nothing to discredit his (plaintiff's) account of the accident and resulting disability, and his statements are supported by the surrounding circumstances."