DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Green v. Board of Com'rs, 111 So. 619.

19 citing documents.

  • State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Stegemann 269 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • State, Department of Highways v. Mayer 257 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    177 , , the front portion of a 1.53 acre residential tract was expropriated.
  • Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Stipe 231 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    In Texas Gas Transmission Corp. vs. C. M. Thibodeaux Co., , the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, determined that swamp land in the rear did not possess the same value as high land abutting the bayou and said: “ 'Although both Green et al v„ Board of Commissioners of Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, ,.
  • State, Department of Highways v. Waterbury 171 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. CM Thibodeaux Co. 148 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Angelle v. State 34 So. 2d 321 La. 1948
  • Smith v. Police Jury of St. Tammany Parish 187 So. 553 La. 1939
    The court held that, when a police jury takes or damages private property for public purposes, it should be held liable, the same as levee boards, “since such boards have been required to pay for property taken or damaged for public purposes”; , 111 So.
  • Cope v. Louisiana State Live Stock Sanitary Board 176 So. 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    of the Court of Appeal, and deny plaintiff’s right to recover for the damage to his crop, would, in the language of Justice Manning, ‘convert the constitutional protection into a false pretense and practically make it only a promise to the ear which it breaks to the hope.’ ” The De Moss Case was cited approvingly in the cases of Green v. Board of Commissioners of Levee District, 163 La, 117, 118, , and Booth v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 171 La.
  • Perry v. Louisiana Highway Commission 164 So. 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
  • Ross v. Board of Levee Com'rs 156 So. 230 La. 1934
  • Mayer v. Board of Com'rs for Caddo Levee Dist. 150 So. 295 La. 1933
  • Connolly v. Louisiana Highway Commission 147 So. 505 La. 1933
    700 , 68 A. L. R. 336, involving a demand for damages, occasioned by the employees of the parish failing to put back a fence, which they had taken down, in widening a right of way for a public road, thereby exposing the landowner’s crop to cattle, to his damage, , 111 So.
  • Nagle v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish 144 So. 425 La. 1932
    700 , 68 A. L. R. 336, involving a demand for damages, occasioned: by the employees of the parish failing to put back a fence, which they had taken down, in widening a right of way for a public road',, thereby exposing the landowner’s crop to cattle, to his damage, , 111 So.
  • Louisiana Highway Commission v. Giaccone 140 So. 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
    118 , , our Supreme Court said: “ ⅜ * * It does not follow that-'each acre of land in a single tract must be taken to have exactly the same value as every other acre therein; that acres of arable land and acres of marsh land, acres of wooded land, and acres of bare land, all have the same value; that orchards and viney
  • Booth v. Louisiana Highway Commission 133 So. 169 La. 1931
    118 , , in which the court held the levee board liable for removing debris from the land, and also for damages caused by negligent use of dynamite by which some trunks and branches *1099 of trees were thrown upon the plaintiff’s residence.
  • Colonial Land Co. v. Board of Com'rs 129 So. 635 La. 1930
  • De Moss v. Police Jury of Bossier Parish 118 So. 700 La. 1928
    118 , , the court held the levee board liable for removing debris from the land, and also for damages caused by the negligent use of dynamite by which some trunks and branches *91 of trees were thrown upon the plaintiff’s residence.
  • McGeehan v. Board of Levee Com'rs. 115 So. 473 La. 1928
    débris which had been left on his property by the levee board and his right to recover adequate compensation for.damage done to hig improvements by the agents or employees of the levee board, acting within the scope of their authority, was recognized and applied in the last expression of this court on the subject, , 111 So.
  • City of New Orleans v. Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. 115 So. 131 La. 1927