DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co., 123 So. 304.

18 citing documents.

  • Weysham v. Aiavolasiti 227 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Hammond, , 123 So.
  • Johnson v. Harper 129 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    785 , , and Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Company of Hammond, , 123 So.
  • Loeb v. Candias 106 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1958
    487 , Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co., , 123 So.
  • Griffin v. Bank of Abbeville & Trust Co. 88 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    In the case of Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Hammond, , 123 So.
  • Harper v. Rosenblath 79 So. 2d 863 La. 1955
    65 ; Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Hammond, , 123 So.
  • Taylor v. Brown 66 So. 2d 578 La. 1953
    588 , Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co., , 123 So.
  • Serio v. Chadwick 66 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Hammond, , 123 So.
  • Lawrence v. Claiborne 41 So. 2d 680 La. 1949
    Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Hammond, , 123 So.
  • Baker v. Baker 26 So. 2d 132 La. 1946
    729 ; Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co., , 123 So.
  • Krauss v. Fry 24 So. 2d 464 La. 1945
    487 ; Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co., , 123 So.
  • Hatch v. Morgan 12 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • Templet v. Babbitt 5 So. 2d 13 La. 1941
    781 , and the cases there cited; Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co., , 123 So.
  • Johnson v. Johnson 185 So. 299 La. 1938
    964 ; Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co., , 123 So.
  • Truett Nash Motor Co. v. Centanni 184 So. 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    674 , we said [page 675]: “In Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Company, , 123 So.
  • Barre v. Hunter 181 So. 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    tic act is full proof of the agreement contained in it, against the contracting parties and their heirs or assigns, unless it be declared and proved a forgery.” And Art. 2276 declares: “Neither shall parol evidence be admitted against or beyond what is contained in the acts, nor on what may have been said before, or at the time of making them, or since.” In Locascio v. State Bank & Trust Co., , 123 So.
  • Franton v. Rusca 175 So. 66 La. 1937
    Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Hammond, , 123 So.
  • Reid v. Phillips 148 So. 690 La. 1933
  • Walsdorf v. Ciolino 127 So. 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    page 728, , the Supreme Court held: “It is the unbroken rule that authentic sales cannot be attacked, except by means of a counterletter or by interrogatories on facts and articles, or by allegation and proof of fraud or error.” Again in the case of Godwin vs. Neustadtl, 42 La.