Bramlette v. Paxton
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 1, 1929 123 So. 504
Bramlette v. Paxton, 228 So. 2d 167 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Paxton v. Bramlette 228 So. 2d 161
Opinion text
CULPEPPER, Judge. For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled “Audrey Paxton v. Hugh T. Bramlette”, 228 So.2d 161 , in which a separate decision is rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present matter is affirmed insofar as it rejects the demands of Hugh T. Bramlette for restitution of his separate and paraphernal funds. All rights are reserved to both plaintiff and defendant to seek a partition and settlement of the community formerly existing between them. All costs in the lower court, as well as the cost of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff appellant. Affirmed, as amended.