Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Southport Mill, Ltd. v. Friedrichs, 118 So. 818.
-
James v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
113 So. 2d 41
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Southport Mill, , 118 So.
-
Dupre v. Consolidated Underwriters
99 So. 2d 522
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
There is, on the one hand, a , 118 So.
-
Sales v. Cloud
88 So. 2d 251
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1956
The Court, quoting authorities, held that a caption might be amended, and quoted the language of our Supreme Court; , 118 So.
-
Bruno v. Gauthier
70 So. 2d 693
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
The Supreme Court, in holding that the caption might be amended, , 118 So.
- Gill v. Citizen 63 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
-
King v. Burris
57 So. 2d 779
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
“Tendency of modern practice is not to yield to technicalities but aid filing of amendments as far as consistent with justice.” , 118 So.
- Slattery Co. v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 39 So. 2d 161 La. 1949
-
Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co.
37 So. 2d 452
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1948
Counsel for defendants and plaintiff in reconvention rely upon this liberal rule concerning amendments and there can be no doubt that the established rule now is, , 118 So.
- Chagnard v. Schiro 156 So. 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
-
Causey v. State Life Ins.
135 So. 747
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
the beneficiary and alleged that Minnie L. Causey was the beneficiary, the amendment was not in conflict with the original answer and at most merely made the issue more distinct, apprising the plaintiff of the proof which would be offered to support the defense, and we are of the opinion that the objection to the amendment was properly overruled ( , 118 So.
-
Livingston v. Southport Mill, Ltd.
136 So. 289
La. 1931
The second suit was that of the Southport Mill, Limited, v. George G. Friedrichs, , 118 So.
-
Southport Mill, Ltd. v. Friedrichs
132 So. 346
La. 1931
See Southport Mill, Limited, v. George G. Friedrichs, , 118 So.
- Kunnes v. Kogos 123 So. 122 La. 1929