Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., 113 So. 833.

25 citing documents.

Delacroix Corp. v. Jones-O'Brien, Inc. 597 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Relying on State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., et al, , 113 So.
Ramsey River Road Property Owners Ass'n v. Reeves 396 So. 2d 873 La. 1981
State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
Ramsey River Road Property Owners Ass'n v. Reeves 387 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
145 ; State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board 317 So. 2d 576 La. 1975
Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Delacroix Corporation 285 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
351 (1920); State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Company, , 113 So.
St. Mary Parish Land Company v. State Mineral Bd. 167 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
D'Albora v. Garcia 144 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
145 ; State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 928 La. 1961
871 (1925); State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 928 La. 1961
871 (1925); State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
9:5661 hereinbefore set forth, and the firmly established jurisprudence of this state commencing with State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
Olin Gas Transmission Corporation v. Harrison 132 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
The State of Louisiana follows the rule laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States on navigability, not any special formula peculiarly adaptable to Louisiana, (State v. Sweet Lake Land [and Oil] Company, , 113 So.
Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 109 So. 2d 58 La. 1959
239 , , presented for consideration the computation of the 10 day delay allowed a defendant for answering a petition.
California Co. v. Price 74 So. 2d 1 La. 1954
State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State Mineral Board 64 So. 2d 839 La. 1953
State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
State v. Aucoin 20 So. 2d 136 La. 1944
Realty Operators, Inc. v. State Mineral Board 12 So. 2d 198 La. 1942
See State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., , 113 So.
Chapman-Storm Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. 200 So. 455 La. 1941
351 ; State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Company, , 113 So.
State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co. 163 So. 145 La. 1935
State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co. 163 So. 145 La. 1935
Wilkins v. Universal Life Ins. Co. 159 So. 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
239 , .” To the same effect seé Evans v. First Nat.
Kelly, Weber & Co. v. F. D. Harvey & Co. 151 So. 201 La. 1933
239 , , in refusing to grant a writ of prohibition, the court stated the meaning of article 318 of the Code of Practice, thus: “The relator has .applied for a writ of prohibition to forbid the confirmation of a preliminary default.
Jones v. International Order of Twelve of Knights & Daughters of Tabor for the Grand Temple & Tabernacle … 148 So. 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1933
239 , .” We conclude that the exception contained in subdivision 10 of article 165, Code Prac., is not applicable to fraternal benefit associations and that therefore the courts of the parish of Orleans are without jurisdiction in this matter, and consequently, that the exception was properly sustained.
Jackson v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co. 142 So. 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Victoria Lumber Co. v. Woodson 127 So. 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
239 , , the Supreme Court decided a situation exactly similar to this and declared that the ten (10) days had expired.
Madison Lbr. Co. v. Alson 126 So. 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
239 , , which it is said holds the contrary.