Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Capital Building & Loan Ass'n v. Carter, 113 So. 886.

15 citing documents.

Hattiesburg Manufacturing Co. v. Pepe 140 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Electrical Contracting Co., Inc. v. Brown, La.App., ; Capital Building & , 113 So.
Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. v. Healy 90 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1956
Cf. Capital Building & , 113 So.
Idom v. Moss 32 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
529 ; Capital Building & Loan Ass’n v. Carter, , 113 So.
General Lumber & Supply Co. v. McLellan 200 So. 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Cf. Capital Building & , 113 So.
National Homestead Ass'n v. Graham 147 So. 348 La. 1933
“Of necessity, some time must be fixed for the recordation of building liens to make them fully effective.” Hortman-Salmen Co. v. White, supra; Capital Building & , 113 So.
Greater New Orleans Homestead Ass'n v. Korner 144 So. 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
is ambiguity as to the time within which privileges must be recorded if they are to enjoy paramount rights over pre-existing incum-brances, but it has been definitely settled that the materialman, if his privilege is to prime the pre-existing mortgage, must record it within thirty days after the completion of the building if there is no building contract (Capital City B. & L. Ass’n v. Carter, , 113 So.
Conservative Homestead Ass'n v. Boyle 135 So. 663 La. 1931
The facts of the case are beyond dispute, and appellant does not question the doctrine established in the cases of Capital Building & , 113 So.
Jackson Homestead Ass'n v. Zimmer 134 So. 126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1931
Cox v. Rockhold 128 So. 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
& Loan Ass’n v. Carter, , 113 So.
Hortman-Salmen Company v. White 123 So. 715 La. 1929
Cf. Capital Building & , 113 So.
Surplus Lumber Co. v. Ferguson 122 So. 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Capital Building & Loan Association vs. Carter (Baton Rouge Sash & Door Works et al., intervenors), , 113 So.
A. Stef Lumber Co. v. Mattingly 122 So. 893 La. 1929
& Loan Ass’n v. Carter, , 113 So.
Union Homestead Ass'n v. Montegut 122 So. 68 La. 1929
O’NIELL, C. J. In the original opinion' rendered in this case it was conceded that, under the doctrine announced in Capital Building & Loan Ass’n v. Carter, , 113 So.
Lieber v. Levy 116 So. 394 La. 1928
Central Lumber Co. v. Schroeder 114 So. 644 La. 1927
But in Capital Building & Loan Association v. Carter, No. 28275, ante, p. 388, , it was held that the privileges granted by that section must be recorded within 30 days from the completion of the work.