Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Blanchard v. Haber, 118 So. 117.
- SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond 808 So. 2d 294 La. 2001
- Winston v. Bourgeois, Bennett, Thokey and Hickey 432 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- Armour v. SHONGALOO LODGE NO. 352, FREE AND ACC. MASONS 330 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
-
Thibodeaux v. Boeuf Land Co.
303 So. 2d 576
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In this same vein, , 118 So.
- Orkin Exterminating Company v. Foti 302 So. 2d 593 La. 1974
- Weight Watchers of Louisiana, Inc. v. Ryals 289 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Foti 287 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
- Northeast La. Detach. of Mar. CL v. City of Monroe 253 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
-
Tac Amusement Co. v. Henry
238 So. 2d 398
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
art. 2464’s serious and proportionate consideration requirement, applicable generally to all contracts, , 118 So.
- McCray v. Cole 236 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
- World Wide Health Studios, Inc. v. Desmond 222 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
-
Delta Finance Company of Louisiana v. Graves
180 So. 2d 85
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
In Martin-Parry Corp. v. New Orleans Fire Detection Service, supra, , 118 So.
- National Motor Club of Louisiana, Inc. v. Conque 173 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
- Long v. Foster & Associates, Inc. 136 So. 2d 48 La. 1961
-
Long v. Foster & Associates, Inc.
129 So. 2d 601
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Learned counsel for defendant quotes at length from, and places substantial reliance upon, , 118 So.
-
Nelson v. Associated Branch Pilots of Port of Lake Charles
63 So. 2d 437
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
1014, ; and Cust v. Item Co., Ltd., 200 La.
-
Martin-Parry Corp. v. New Orleans Fire Detection Service
60 So. 2d 83
La. 1952
In concluding thus, , 118 So.
- Pennington v. Drews 24 So. 2d 156 La. 1945
- Cust v. Item Co. 8 So. 2d 361 La. 1942
-
Hanks v. Shreveport Yellow Cabs, Inc.
187 So. 817
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Plaintiff’s counsel, in support of his last contention, cites, , 118 So.
- Cloverland Dairy Products Co. v. Grace 157 So. 393 La. 1934
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Toms 153 So. 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1934
- Chavez v. United Motor Car Co. 151 So. 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- United Carbon Co. v. Interstate Natural Gas Co. 147 So. 37 La. 1933
- Railway Audit & Inspection Co. v. Pendleton 142 So. 781 La. 1932
-
Shreveport Laundries, Inc. v. Teagle
139 So. 563
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
The only Louisiana cases bearing upon the main issues in these two cases under consideration, which have been cited by counsel, , 118 So.
-
Yates v. Batteford
139 So. 37
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
“The question of adequacy of the consideration is a matter for the parties themselves to determine.” , 118 So.
- Nabors Oil Corporation v. Samuels 127 So. 363 La. 1930