DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Miller, 113 So. 814.

20 citing documents.

  • Succession of Adger 457 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Gathright v. Smith 368 So. 2d 679 La. 1979
    193 , (1927); Patton v. Cities of Philadelphia and New Orleans, 1 La.Ann.
  • Price v. Price 326 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    193 , (1927); Waterhouse v. Star Land Company, 139 La.
  • King v. Cancienne 303 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    193 , (1927) and in Succession of Pigg, 228 La.
  • Succession of Barbier 296 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    193 , ; Dion v. Traders & General Insurance Co., La.App., 183 So.
  • Succession of Choyce 183 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    193 , (1927) as follows: "And the rule was correctly laid down in Patton v. Cities of Philadelphia and New Orleans, 1 La.Ann.
  • Succession of Jene 173 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
  • Succession of Hopkins 114 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    193 , ; Dillon v. Traders & General Insurance Co., La.App., 183 So.
  • Texas Company v. Stewart 101 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1958
    193 , ; Succession of Thomas, 144 La.
  • Prince v. Hopson 89 So. 2d 128 La. 1956
    193 , , and Succession of Fields, 222 La.
  • Succession of Verrett 70 So. 2d 89 La. 1953
    193 , ; Hondlenk v. John, 178 La.
  • Succession of Fields 62 So. 2d 495 La. 1952
    193 , : “And the rule was correctly laid, down in Patton v. Philadelphia, 1 La.
  • Eason v. Alexander Shipyards 47 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
  • Funderburk v. Funderburk 38 So. 2d 502 La. 1949
  • Succession of Chavis 29 So. 2d 860 La. 1947
    193 , ; Dillon v. Traders & General Insurance Co., La.App., 183 So.
  • Jackson v. Gordon 186 So. 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
    193 , .’ “Accordingly, when Mary Lucas died, the plaintiff, Charles Jackson, inherited her one-half of the forty acres of land in suit, and the other one-half belongs to Mary V. Sanders, unless either or both have lost or disposed of their respective shares therein, and the court now addresses itself to this question.
  • Howard v. Ingle 180 So. 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    193, 197 , , anent this question, the court stated: “And the rule was correctly laid down in Patton v. Cities of Philadelphia & New Orleans, 1 La.Ann.
  • Scott v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 174 So. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    193 , ; Hondlenk v. John, 178 La.
  • Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Fernandez 159 So. 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
  • Hondlenk v. John 152 So. 67 La. 1934