Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Donaldson's Heirs v. City of New Orleans, 118 So. 134.
-
River Rental Realty LLC v. Deep S. Leasing, LLC
250 So. 3d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Donaldson's Heirs v. City of New Orleans , , 1063, 118 So.
- Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'n 851 So. 2d 1006 La. 2003
- Landry v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 343 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Winningham v. Hill 164 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Kellogg v. Hall
159 So. 2d 596
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
44 ; Donaldson’s , 118 So.
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. New Orleans Term. Co. 156 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
- Calhoun v. State 152 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
- City of Alexandria v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad 126 So. 2d 351 La. 1961
-
Wyatt v. Hagler
107 So. 2d 568
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
497 ; Donaldson’s , 118 So.
-
Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Gulf Soap Corp.
29 So. 2d 841
La. 1947
Code of Practice, Art. 565; Donaldson’s Heirs v. City of New Orleans, 1928, , 118 So.
-
Palmer v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen
197 So. 697
La. 1940
at from $100.00 to $150.00 each, all owners of corner lots will be similarly affected as your petitioner.” Plaintiff’s contention that the paving assessment of $728 against her property is in excess of its value, and therefore deprives plaintiff of her property without due process of law, is answered completely by the decision of this court in the case of Donaldson’s , 118 So.
-
Hagmann v. City of New Orleans
182 So. 753
La. 1938
179 ; Donald *805 son’s , 118 So.
-
Brock v. Stassi
179 So. 44
La. 1938
719 ; Donaldson’s , 118 So.
-
State Ex Rel. Ideal Savings & Homestead Ass'n v. City of New Orleans
173 So. 179
La. 1937
We find it unnecessary to discuss this point for the reason that the identical question was raised and decided in the case of Donaldson’s , 118 So.
- New Orleans & N. E. R. R. v. City of New Orleans 126 So. 673 La. 1930
-
Judice v. Village of Scott
121 So. 592
La. 1929
Ann. 282 ; Donaldson’s , 118 So.
-
Town of Pineville v. Ball
119 So. 738
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
1059 , ; Sheen vs. Stothart et al., 29 La.