Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Whitson v. American Ice Co., 113 So. 849.

26 citing documents.

Osvin Morales-Martinez Versus Jovan Lymuel, Intrastate Trucking, LLC, Landrieu Concrete and Cement Industries, LLC, Rhl Investments, LLC, and … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Brenda Bergeron , Individually An D On Behalf Of Her La. 2021
Jan Alfred Langston v. Dr. Syed Fazal-Ur-Rehman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Larry Bize, Sr. and Michelle R. Bize v. Malcolm Larvadain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Bize v. Larvadain 263 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Carter , ; Whitson v. American Ice Co. , , 113 So.
Aleashia Clarkston v. Ike Funderburk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Clarkston v. Funderburk 211 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Two Canal Street Investors, Inc. v. New Orleans Building Corp. 202 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Whitson v. American Ice Co., [ ,] 113 So.
Freeman v. KENNER BD. OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS 40 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Freeman v. Kenner Board of Zoning Adjustments 40 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Vines v. Vines 379 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
* * * ” The source of this statute is Act 111 of 1926 , 113 So.
Ewell v. Petro-Processors of Louisiana, Inc. 343 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Stewart v. Avery 341 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Carter v. Phillips 337 So. 2d 187 La. 1976
Carter v. Phillips 325 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Carville v. City of Plaquemine 303 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Romero v. Romero, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1970), , 113 So.
Stump v. City of Shreveport 255 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Romero v. Romero 232 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
This section shall not apply to the Parish of Orleans and to cases brought in forma pauperis, nor to the state or any political subdivision thereof.” *574 , 113 So.
Carpenter v. Carpenter 92 So. 2d 393 La. 1956
Tatum v. Toledo Scale Co. 187 So. 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
McGregor v. Novo 188 So. 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
Jones v. Williams 184 So. 565 La. 1938
Norton v. Perez 180 So. 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
third opponent or intervenor to give security for the cost in such case, and on failure to do so within the time fixed by the Court such suit, third opposition or intervention, as the case may be, shall be dismissed as in case of non-suit; provided this shall not apply to cases brought in forma pauperis, nor to the state or any political subdivision thereof.” , 113 So.
Salmon v. Martin 164 So. 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
ost in such case,” and section 5 of Act No. 203 of 1898, provides that clerks of the district courts “may * * * demand security for cost at the time of filing suit and all accrued cost after the advance cost has been exhausted demand security for further cost which shall be due and collectible January 1 and July 1, during the pendency of the suit,” , 113 So.
Buckley v. Thibodaux 159 So. 603 La. 1935
Hardee v. Beard 152 So. 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934