Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Hurwitz v. Recorder of Mortgages, 115 So. 582.

15 citing documents.

Slaughter v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 33 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1947
Booker v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana 6 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
336 , , apply in this case rather than those of the Robinson case.
Robinson v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana 195 So. 351 La. 1940
Robinson v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana 191 So. 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Ross v. Armour Fertilizer Works 168 So. 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
336 , , a separation by mutual consent which had existed for three or four months prior to the death of the workman was held to prevent recovery by the widow.
Calcasieu Building & Loan Ass'n v. Goudeau 161 So. 599 La. 1935
Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Fernandez 159 So. 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
336 , , which is relied upon by the putative wife, because in that case, though it is true' that the separation had existed for only three or four months, still it had taken place as the result of “mutual consent.” We understand that when the Supreme Court used that term it meant that the parties had agreed to disagree and
Lotz v. Hurwitz 141 So. 83 La. 1932
Knox v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Co. 138 So. 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
336 , , our Supreme Court has definitely settled the question of the wife recovering for compensation where the spouses are living separate and apart at the time of the death of the husband, and we quote as follows: “We think the facts show that at the time of decedent’s death, and for three or four months preceding hi
Zuviceh v. Schnyder 137 So. 379 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1931
336 , , a case involving the same issues presented here, the Supreme Court held: “We think the facts show that at the time of decedent’s death, and for three or four months preceding his death, the relator and the .deceased lived separate and apart, by mutual consent; that relator maintained herself during that time, a
Hurwitz v. Lotz 133 So. 351 La. 1931
Swift & Co. v. Villemeur 131 So. 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Harris v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp. 127 So. 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
336 , , *420 where it was held that a wife separated from her husband could not recover compensation.
Cappel v. Hundley 121 So. 176 La. 1929
State Ex Rel. Metropolitan Land Co. v. Recorder of Mortgages 117 So. 145 La. 1928