Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 115 So. 911.

19 citing documents.

  • Lacour v. Theard 439 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • Agee v. Bolton 438 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Schaefer v. Schaefer 379 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Gathright v. Smith 368 So. 2d 679 La. 1979
  • Succession of Zinsel 360 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Gathright v. Smith 352 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    117 and 118 since he merely relied on decedent's statement that she was no longer married, , 115 So.
  • Succession of Barbier 296 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    1st Cir. 1959) , 115 So.
  • Hibbert v. Mudd 272 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
  • Keller v. Keller 220 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    406 ; Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 1928, , 115 So.
  • Guerin v. Bonaventure 190 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Hibbert v. Mudd 187 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Succession of Leduc 153 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Jackson v. Hampton 134 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    406 ; Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 1928, , 115 So.
  • Succession of Hopkins 114 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
  • Austin v. Succession of Austin 73 So. 2d 312 La. 1954
    ator in concubina ge incapable of recovering, as a universal partner, -one-half of the property acquired, although her labor may have contributed nothing towards its accumulation; but, when her capital and labor has contributed a -full share, towards the result, equity entitled her to half the property acquired.” Counsel for plaintiff cites the case of Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 165 La, 710, .
  • Succession of Scott 58 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    There is no question of a partnership involved as none was alleged and none proven in accordance with the requirements of our civil code pertaining to partnerships, and, therefore, the cases cited in the brief filed on behalf of Harrison Wilson, viz., , 115 So.
  • Funderburk v. Funderburk 38 So. 2d 502 La. 1949
  • Dillon v. Traders General Ins. Co. 183 So. 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
  • Purvis v. Purvis 162 So. 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    A. No, I didn’t ask anything about it.” , 115 So.