Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 115 So. 911.
- Lacour v. Theard 439 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- Agee v. Bolton 438 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Schaefer v. Schaefer 379 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Gathright v. Smith 368 So. 2d 679 La. 1979
- Succession of Zinsel 360 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
-
Gathright v. Smith
352 So. 2d 282
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
117 and 118 since he merely relied on decedent's statement that she was no longer married, , 115 So.
-
Succession of Barbier
296 So. 2d 390
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
1st Cir. 1959) , 115 So.
- Hibbert v. Mudd 272 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
-
Keller v. Keller
220 So. 2d 745
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
406 ; Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 1928, , 115 So.
- Guerin v. Bonaventure 190 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Hibbert v. Mudd 187 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
- Succession of Leduc 153 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
-
Jackson v. Hampton
134 So. 2d 114
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
406 ; Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 1928, , 115 So.
- Succession of Hopkins 114 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
-
Austin v. Succession of Austin
73 So. 2d 312
La. 1954
ator in concubina ge incapable of recovering, as a universal partner, -one-half of the property acquired, although her labor may have contributed nothing towards its accumulation; but, when her capital and labor has contributed a -full share, towards the result, equity entitled her to half the property acquired.” Counsel for plaintiff cites the case of Prieto v. Succession of Prieto, 165 La, 710, .
-
Succession of Scott
58 So. 2d 745
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
There is no question of a partnership involved as none was alleged and none proven in accordance with the requirements of our civil code pertaining to partnerships, and, therefore, the cases cited in the brief filed on behalf of Harrison Wilson, viz., , 115 So.
- Funderburk v. Funderburk 38 So. 2d 502 La. 1949
- Dillon v. Traders General Ins. Co. 183 So. 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
-
Purvis v. Purvis
162 So. 239
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
A. No, I didn’t ask anything about it.” , 115 So.