Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Kyle, 123 So. 306.
-
In re the Succession of Morgan
938 So. 2d 196
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
These signatures are “mere surplusage, and to be disregarded.” , 123 So.
- In Re Succession of Plummer 847 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Petty v. Petty 560 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Succession of Bacot 502 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
-
Succession of Green v. Mears
499 So. 2d 637
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
secret, reserve or disguise, not merely one that is notorious; that ‘the concubinage should be so public as to be practically avowed, not necessarily by word, but 'at any rate by unambi-gious, unequivocal conduct; that the relations must be such that, when sought to be made the basis of judicial action, no odious inquisitions might be necessary, and no nice poising of testimony.’ ” , 123 So.
- Gray v. Gray 451 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- Thomas v. Thomas 440 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
Estate of Wartelle
428 So. 2d 1300
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
In resolving the conflicting interpretation of Evans by respective counsel, the trial court considered cases, wherein the testator's intent was upheld despite imperfect compliance with testamentary requirements, including: , 123 So.
- Succession of Burke 365 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
- Succession of Boyd 306 So. 2d 687 La. 1975
-
Succession of Barnett
245 So. 2d 418
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
It can be dated at the head, at the foot, in the body, or even after the signature.” , 123 So.
- Succession of Keuhling 187 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
-
Oroszy v. Burkard
158 So. 2d 405
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Succession of Jones, La.App., 2 Cir., ; , 123 So.
- Succession of Marshall 126 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Succession of Moore 94 So. 2d 666 La. 1957
- Succession Moore 94 So. 2d 666 La. 1957
- Succession of Franz 94 So. 2d 270 La. 1957
- Succession of Roth 94 So. 2d 270 La. 1957
- Love v. Dawkins 62 So. 2d 399 La. 1952
- Love v. Dawkins 62 So. 2d 399 La. 1952
- Succession of Jones 38 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
- Succession of Smart 36 So. 2d 639 La. 1948
- Succession of Eastman 6 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1942