Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hitt v. Herndon, 117 So. 568.
- State v. Reynolds 772 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
-
Bryant v. Sears Consumer Financial Corp.
617 So. 2d 1191
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
In setting the decision aside and determining that the equitable interest was the amount paid on the purchase price of the property, the court, , 117 So.
-
Hebert v. First Guar. Bank
493 So. 2d 150
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
497 , (1928); ...; Tolbird v. Cooper, [supra].
- Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co. v. Brule 389 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Samaniego v. Horseless Carriage, Inc. 350 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
- Neff v. Ford Motor Credit Co. 347 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
Tolbird v. Cooper
143 So. 2d 80
La. 1962
The Court of Appeal was of the view that, inasmuch as the defendant had wrongfully taken plaintiff’s truck, the district *311 judge was correct in excluding the evidence which defendant sought to introduce in support of his «conventional demand under the provisions of Article 2210 , 117 So.
- Tolbird v. Cooper 136 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
-
Route v. Smith Chevrolet Co.
128 So. 2d 58
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
In support of its exceptions Defendant relies upon the cases of Kings Truck & Body Works v. Barrett, La.App., ; , 117 So.
- Smith v. Bell Auto Sales 121 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- Port Finance Company v. Campbell 94 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- McCoy v. Hejo Realty Co. 90 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Young v. Eddy 86 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Brian v. Wilson 81 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
-
Curry v. Caillier
37 So. 2d 863
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
120 , to be authority on this point, and so is the case of Hitt v. Herndon , 117 So.
- A.B.C. Oil Burner Heating Co. v. Palmer 28 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- Birdow v. Midyett 9 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- State McLain v. Judge of Seventeenth Jud. Dist. Court 8 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
-
Strange v. Albrecht
176 So. 700
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1937
Appellee, in his criticism of the Mitchell Case, , 117 So.
- Bryson v. Bates-Crumley Chevrolet Co. 171 So. 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
- Bryson v. Bates-Crumley Chevrolet Co. 166 So. 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
-
Ferrara v. Polito.
167 So. 120
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
The Supreme Court of our state has been called upon to apply the cited article in several instances, *122 , 117 So.
- Craddock v. Jones 143 So. 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Pirkle & Williams, Inc. v. Shreveport Jitney Jungle, Inc.
140 So. 837
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
657 ; Viterbo v. J. Friedlander et al., 120 U. S. 707 , 7 S. Ct. 962 , 30 L. Ed. 776 ; , 117 So.
-
Ford v. Russell
128 So. 310
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1930
459 ; Hitt vs. Herndon, , 117 So.