No. 2887
Precedential
Processed
Sommers v. Schmidt
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 25, 1969 228 So. 2d 512; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 5, 1968 206 So. 2d 723; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 12, 1929 121 So. 331
Sommers v. Schmidt, 25 La. Ann. 193 (1873).
Opinion text
Wyly, J. This suit must be dismissed, because it was brought by the plaintiff, a married woman, without the authorization of her husband. Where the husband has not appeared with his wife, the latter must show his authorization otherwise than in her own averments, or those of her counsel. Succession of Pomroy and authorities there cited. 21 An. 576. It is therefore ordered that this suit be dismissed at plaintiff’s •costs.