Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Red River Const. Co. v. Pierce Petroleum Corporation, 115 So. 752.
- Martinolich v. Albert 143 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
- Southport Petroleum Co. v. Fithian 13 So. 2d 382 La. 1943
- Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain 1 So. 2d 545 La. 1941
- In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 169 So. 464 La. 1936
-
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.
167 So. 858
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
323 ; Article 3185, Civ.Code; , 115 So.
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 161 So. 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 160 So. 609 La. 1935
- Anderson v. Harvey & Jones 154 So. 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Williams Gray v. Stewart 147 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1933
-
H. R. Hayes Lumber Co. v. McConnell
146 So. 14
La. 1932
One, among these, , 115 So.
-
General Lumber & Supply Co. v. Hunter
134 So. 759
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Our conclusion was, in a large measure, influenced by our consideration of the following cases: , 115 So.
-
Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co.
133 So. 438
La. 1931
In support of its contention, , 115 So.
-
Southern Gas Line, Inc. v. Dixie Oil Co.
133 So. 181
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
It has been, in effect, twice decided by this court— , 115 So.
-
Rester v. Moody & Stewart
130 So. 254
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
The Act No. 271 of 1926 was no doubt prompted by the decisions of the Supreme Court construing the liability of the surety, ■ in Act No. 224 of 1918, in Red River Construction Co. v. Pierce Petroleum Cor *180 poration, , 115 So.
-
John H. Murphy Iron Works v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
124 So. 768
La. 1929
It has been, in effect, twice decided by this court — , 115 So.
- Brooks v. Byrd Clopton 122 So. 287 La. 1929
- Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. Hulse 120 So. 589 La. 1929
- State v. Smith 119 So. 56 La. 1928