Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vercher v. Roy, 131 So. 658.

15 citing documents.

Succession of Harrison 183 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Jurisprudence In support of his position, Mr. Himes cited three cases: , 131 So.
Carter v. Carter 538 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Succession of Amos 422 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Matter of Succession of Vice 385 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Succession of Palermo 359 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Broussard v. Broussard 340 So. 2d 1309 La. 1976
Washington v. Sabine State Bank & Trust Co. 328 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Succession of Zurak 274 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Basco v. Central Bank & Trust Company 231 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
1915B, 396 (1914); , 131 So.
American Universal Insurance v. Coleman 121 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
13:3331-13:-3349, was enacted pursuant to such constitutional direction, and in the above-cited Winnfield Furniture decision the Supreme Court upheld a judgment of garnishment rendered by default or confession by the clerk pursuant to this statutory authorization, noting, : “The right of the clerk to exercise' the judicial powers vested in him is in no manner dependent upon whether the court is in session or not, or whether it is in vacation or not.” (Italics ours.)
Bordelon v. Brown 84 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Appellant contends the District Court erred in not applying the principles pronounced in Vercher v. Roy, 1930, , 131 So.
Northcott v. Livingood 10 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Opposition of Roy v. Vercher 158 So. 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
The Supreme Court ruled against her contentions ( , 131 So.
Byrd v. Babin 159 So. 718 La. 1935
Roy v. Succession of v. Rcher 141 So. 33 La. 1932
ROGERS, J. This case is a sequel to the case of Vercher v. Roy, reported in , 131 So.