Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Erskine Heirs v. Gardiner, 118 So. 453.
-
Debs v. Sunrise Homes, Inc.
430 So. 2d 110
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Keel v. Rodessa Oil & Land Co., supra; , 118 So.
- Angelloz v. Angelloz 16 So. 2d 654 La. 1944
- Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. Shushan 2 So. 2d 35 La. 1941
-
Granier v. Bourgeois
188 So. 423
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
“The test to be applied” stated the court, “in considering a plea of mis-joinder is whether the parties, plaintiffs or defendants, have a common interest in the subject-matter of the suit.” , 118 So.
-
Keel v. Rodessa Oil & Land Co.
180 So. 502
La. 1938
715 , as follows: “The test to be applied in considering a plea of misjoinder is whether the parties, plaintiffs or defendants, have a common interest in the subject-matter of the suit.” , 118 So.
- Overruled State Ex Rel. Violet Trapping Co. v. Grace 162 So. 26 La. 1935
- McCaskey Register Co. v. Barnes 146 So. 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Officer v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. 139 So. 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Silbernagel v. Harrell
138 So. 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Ann. 483 , the court said: “The right to rescind a sale for lesion beyond moiety, is the only restraint upon the liberty of the citizen to bind himself and his property according to the dictates of his own judgment; and the evidence relied on to establish lesion should be peculiarly strong and conclusive.” , on page 1102, 118 So.
- State Ex Rel. Elston v. Parish Democratic Executive Committee 138 So. 857 La. 1931
- Foster v. Spann 129 So. 622 La. 1930
- Foster v. Spann 129 So. 622 La. 1930
- Castille v. Texas Co. 129 So. 518 La. 1930