Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 119 So. 56.

17 citing documents.

CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELEC. v. Giant Enterprises 371 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Slagle-Johnson Lumber, Inc. v. Landis Construction Co. 366 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
The Hayes Lumber Co. case also discussed the equities which were there, as well as here, argued: “ 321 , 119 So.
Anderson v. Harvey & Jones 154 So. 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Tennessee-Arkansas Gravel Co. v. Harvey 151 So. 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Such fees are authorized by section 8 of Act *134 No. 224 of 1918, , 119 So.
Williams Gray v. Stewart 147 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1933
H. R. Hayes Lumber Co. v. McConnell 146 So. 14 La. 1932
A disintegration of the elements composing the improvement would not reveal the presence of gasoline or oil, and consequently the gasoline and oil do not enter into the construction of the improvement, because they form no part thereof.” 321 , 119 So.
Smith v. Smith 142 So. 132 La. 1932
Smith, Jr., testified: “I called him (J. B. Smith) and asked him if he would buy this lumber for me and I would give him ten per cent on top of the invoices, and he told me he would.” Counsel for plaintiff cite, in support of their contention that the surety on the contractor’s bond is liable, , 119 So.
General Lumber & Supply Co. v. Hunter 134 So. 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
302 , ; and Pipes v. Irvine et al., 7 La.
Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co. 133 So. 438 La. 1931
Southern Gas Line, Inc. v. Dixie Oil Co. 133 So. 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Rester v. Moody & Stewart 130 So. 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
302 , , and some decisions- of the Court of Appeal, and the Legislature decided to broaden the meaning of the act.
Perry v. J. M. Lewis & Co. 129 So. 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
See State vs. Smith, , 119 So.
Lane v. E. J. Deas Co. 125 So. 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1929
Such was the holding in the very recent case of State et al. vs. Smith et al., , 119 So.
John H. Murphy Iron Works v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 124 So. 768 La. 1929
Colonial Creosoting Co. v. Perry 124 So. 182 La. 1929
A. Stef Lumber Co. v. Mattingly 122 So. 893 La. 1929
Brooks v. Byrd Clopton 122 So. 287 La. 1929