Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, 32 So. 2d 66.
-
Miles v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERV., INC.
393 So. 2d 877
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
in which a medical report by a company physician was held admissible, even though the physician himself did not testify, where he had died before trial and his signature was identified by another company doctor.
-
Richard v. Guillot
271 So. 2d 719
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
1st Cir. 1946); (La.App.
- Beasley v. Service Fdry. Div. of Avondale Ship., Inc. 235 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
-
Harrell v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.
143 So. 2d 140
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
This report was objected'to, however, this court had an occasion to rule on this exact question in Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., , in which the court held: “The evidence shows that the entries were made in the regular course of the business and in carrying out the duties of the employees who made the entries.
-
Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company
134 So. 2d 717
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
(writs denied February 16, 1948) the plaintiff testified that on August 26, 1944, while working on his employer's premises, he slipped off a boardwalk and fell on his hip.
-
Richmond v. Weiss & Goldring, Inc.
124 So. 2d 601
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
1 Cir., , certiorari denied; see also 20 Am.Jr.
-
Waters v. LL Brewton Lumber Co.
120 So. 2d 842
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Montgomery v. Walter Kellogg Lumber Company, Inc., et al., supra; Fouchea v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc., La.App., ; Roy v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co., La.App., ; Roy v. Guillot, La.App., ; Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.
-
Montgomery v. Walter Kellogg Lumber Co.
120 So. 2d 353
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Co., La.App., ; Roy v. Guillot, La.App., ; Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
-
Card v. Southern Builders, Inc.
117 So. 2d 675
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
uchea v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc., La.App., ; Wyatt v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., ; France v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp., La.App., ; Dossey v. International Paper Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Andrus, La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O'Connor v. American Automobile Ins.
-
Brown v. Yellow Cab Company of Shreveport
94 So. 2d 573
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
260 , and Cascio v. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, La.App., .
-
France v. City of New Orleans
92 So. 2d 473
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Wherland v. Crowell Long Leaf Lumber Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
-
Holmes v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
91 So. 2d 90
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O’Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .” There are many other cases in our jurisprudence with the same holding.
-
Zito v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.
76 So. 2d 25
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De NeMours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O'Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .
-
Knox v. Ethyl Corp.
53 So. 2d 443
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
is well established that the plaintiff in a compensation case must prove his claim with reasonable certainty and that a court cannot resort to speculation and probabilities in awarding a compensation claim to a claimant.” The lower court, in rendering decision, distinguished Hill v. J. H. Beaird Corporation, La.App., , and cited Cascio v. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, La.App., ; Duracher v. Canulette Shipbuilding Company, Inc., La.App., ; and Smith v. McMichael, La.App., .