Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, 32 So. 2d 66.

14 citing documents.

  • Miles v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERV., INC. 393 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    in which a medical report by a company physician was held admissible, even though the physician himself did not testify, where he had died before trial and his signature was identified by another company doctor.
  • Richard v. Guillot 271 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    1st Cir. 1946); (La.App.
  • Beasley v. Service Fdry. Div. of Avondale Ship., Inc. 235 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
  • Harrell v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 143 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    This report was objected'to, however, this court had an occasion to rule on this exact question in Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., , in which the court held: “The evidence shows that the entries were made in the regular course of the business and in carrying out the duties of the employees who made the entries.
  • Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    (writs denied February 16, 1948) the plaintiff testified that on August 26, 1944, while working on his employer's premises, he slipped off a boardwalk and fell on his hip.
  • Richmond v. Weiss & Goldring, Inc. 124 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    1 Cir., , certiorari denied; see also 20 Am.Jr.
  • Waters v. LL Brewton Lumber Co. 120 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Montgomery v. Walter Kellogg Lumber Company, Inc., et al., supra; Fouchea v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc., La.App., ; Roy v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co., La.App., ; Roy v. Guillot, La.App., ; Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.
  • Montgomery v. Walter Kellogg Lumber Co. 120 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Roy v. Guillot, La.App., ; Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • Card v. Southern Builders, Inc. 117 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    uchea v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc., La.App., ; Wyatt v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., ; France v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp., La.App., ; Dossey v. International Paper Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Andrus, La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O'Connor v. American Automobile Ins.
  • Brown v. Yellow Cab Company of Shreveport 94 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    260 , and Cascio v. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, La.App., .
  • France v. City of New Orleans 92 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Wherland v. Crowell Long Leaf Lumber Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • Holmes v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 91 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O’Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .” There are many other cases in our jurisprudence with the same holding.
  • Zito v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 76 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De NeMours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O'Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .
  • Knox v. Ethyl Corp. 53 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    is well established that the plaintiff in a compensation case must prove his claim with reasonable certainty and that a court cannot resort to speculation and probabilities in awarding a compensation claim to a claimant.” The lower court, in rendering decision, distinguished Hill v. J. H. Beaird Corporation, La.App., , and cited Cascio v. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, La.App., ; Duracher v. Canulette Shipbuilding Company, Inc., La.App., ; and Smith v. McMichael, La.App., .