Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. Breard Motor Co., 120 So. 478.

16 citing documents.

Prince v. Paretti Pontiac Company, Inc. 281 So. 2d 112 La. 1973
346 , (1953); Jackson v. Breard Motor Co., Inc., , 120 So.
Peters v. Pattison Pontiac Co. 259 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Cosey v. Cambre 204 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
In so contending, appellant relies upon Jackson v. Breard Motor Co., Inc., , 120 So.
Route v. Smith Chevrolet Co. 128 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
871 ; Jackson v. Breard Motor Co., Inc., , 120 So.
Falk v. Luke Motor Company, Inc. 112 So. 2d 683 La. 1959
871 ; Jackson v. Breard - Motor Co., , 120 So.
Reech v. Coco 65 So. 2d 790 La. 1953
590 ; Jackson v. Breard Motor Co., 1929, , 120 So.
Roby Motors Co. v. Price 173 So. 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Hemenway, Inc. v. Williamson 173 So. 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Brown-Roberts Hardware & Supply Co. v. Evans 153 So. 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
S. P. Weaver Lumber & Supply Co. v. Paramount Wood Products Co. 146 So. 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Dugue v. Safety Oil Burners, Inc. 142 So. 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
A. Baldwin Sales Co. v. Mitchell 142 So. 700 La. 1932
Roby Motors Co. v. Harrison 139 So. 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Plauche, Locke Securities, Inc. v. B. Bazerque & Sons 139 So. 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Standard Motor Co. v. St. Amant 134 So. 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
fit for the purpose intended.” In that case in which reference was made to a secondhand machine, the thing sold here, the court said: “A secondhand article must be fit to do the work intended,” which was approved in Jackson v. Breard Motor Co., Inc., , 120 So.
Stracener v. Nunnally Bros. MoTor Co. 121 So. 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Jackson vs. Breard Motor Co., , 120 So.