Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Saxton v. Para Rubber Co., 117 So. 235.
- Dorsa v. Parent 352 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Sternberg v. Mason 339 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Baham v. Faust 333 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
-
Nagem v. Foret's Drug Store, Inc.
162 So. 2d 354
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
In support of his position, , 117 So.
-
DiFatta v. Campagna
157 So. 2d 633
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
430 ; Saxton v. Para Rubber Co. of *634 Louisiana, , 117 So.
- Lee v. Abernathy 19 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
- Rex Credit Co. v. Kirsch 4 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- Belvin v. Sikes 2 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- Cantu v. Fenner, Beane Ungerleider 160 So. 399 La. 1935
- Federal Land Bank v. Mulhern 157 So. 370 La. 1934
- Maestri v. Nall 145 So. 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
-
Edwards v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana
144 So. 430
La. 1932
These two cases excepted, the payment must be made at the dwelling of the debtor.” Hence, it is a rule that, “where the lease is silent as to where the rent shall be paid, the payment is to be made either at the leased premises or at the domicile of the debtor, and this presupposes, of course, that the lessor is to call for his rent.” , 117 So.
- Richardson v. American Nat. Ins. Co. 137 So. 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
-
Saxton v. Para Rubber Co.
118 So. 64
La. 1928
PAUL, J. This is a “follow-up” or continuation of a similar suit between the same parties lately decided by us (May 7, 1928) under No. 29201 of our docket ( , lit So.