Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Vincennes Bridge Co., 118 So. 820.

17 citing documents.

Dupre v. Consolidated Underwriters 99 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
818, 820 , to the effect that amendment is permitted when it "does not change the original relief asked for" by the prayer, , even though based upon another cause of action, see, e. g., Labarre v. *527 Rateau, 210 La.
Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co. 37 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1948
101 , ]: "Our conclusion is, also, that the court below should have permitted the supplemental answer to be filed.
Durant v. Industrial Lumber Co. 6 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works 2 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
the time of the accident, we believe it could be demonstrated beyond question that, in view of the nature of the arrangement for the furnishing of transportation service by plaintiff and Garma to The Texas Company, plaintiff was clearly an independent contractor and not an employee of The Texas Company", , 118 So.
Distinguished Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc. 195 So. 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Merritt v. E. L. Bruce Co. 166 So. 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Distinguished Hall v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co. 158 So. 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Jones v. Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Co. 157 So. 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Moritz v. K. C. S. Drug Co., Inc. 149 So. 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Miller v. Foster 145 So. 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Paragraph 8 of section 3, Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended by Act No. 85 of 1926; Johnson *802 v. Vincennes Bridge Co., , 118 So.
Hughes v. Lyon Lumber Co. 143 So. 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
108 , ; Myers v. Newport Co., 17 La.
Town of Napoleonville v. Boudreaux 142 So. 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
1084 , , and other decisions of similar import.
Armes v. Williams Bros. 136 So. 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Cobb v. Long Bell Lumber Co. 134 So. 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
539 , and which was subsequently approved in Id., , 118 So.
Beck v. Dubach Lumber Co. 131 So. 196 La. 1930
108 , , where the plaintiff was employed to unload a carload of steel at $2 per ton, and to furnish all trucks and labor necessary for the work, and was not carried on defendant’s-pay roll, and defendant did not exercise any supervision over the work, it was -held that he was an independent contractor.
James v. Hillyer-Deutsch-Edwards, Inc. 130 So. 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
539, 540 , and Id., , 118 So.
Jackson v. Forest Product Chemical Co. 121 So. 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
but this decision is not controlling, as the facts differ substantially.