Muse v. Muse
Muse v. Muse, 33 So. 2d 128 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947).
Cited by
- Kinney v. Kinney 150 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
- Simms v. Lawrence Bros. 72 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
- Simms v. Lawrence Bros. 72 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Succession of Francke 52 So. 2d 855 La. 1951
- Muse v. Muse 40 So. 2d 21 La. 1949
- Succession of Dugas 39 So. 2d 750 La. 1949
- Succession of Dugas 33 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Farrar v. Johnson 172 La. 30
- Succession v. Berthelot 24 So. 2d 185
Opinion text
I agree with the reasoning in the majority opinion which holds that the services rendered by a son or daughter to a parent should not be presumed to be gratuitous, except in those cases where the parent is in need, however, I feel that we are bound to follow the holding of the Supreme Court in the case of Farrar v. Johnson, 172 La. 30 , 133 So. 352 , and which ruling we followed in the recent case of Succession of Berthelot, La. App., 24 So.2d 185 . Therefore, it is my opinion that the plaintiff in this case was required to allege and prove some promise, express or implied, on the part of the deceased to compensate the services. Having failed to make such allegation and proof, plaintiff is not entitled to recover any compensation for the services rendered. I therefore respectfully dissent.