Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite O'Connor v. American Automobile Ins. Co., 32 So. 2d 624.

15 citing documents.

  • Richard v. Guillot 271 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    1st Cir. 1947); (La.App.
  • Brister v. Great American Insurance 171 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    ndition that there is nothing to discredit the plaintiff’s account of the accident and the resulting disability and his statements are supported by the surrounding circumstances.” See also Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., La.App., (3 Cir.1961); Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., ; O’Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    App., ; O'Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., .'" And, , the Court states at page 492: "We concede the proposition urged by learned counsel for plaintiff to the effect that there is precedent in our jurisprudence for the application of the general principle that the testimony of a plaintiff alone is sufficient to
  • Theriot v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. 131 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
  • Sneed v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 126 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., .” This court also had occasion to rule on a very similar situation in Dunn v. Remington Rand, Inc., La.App.
  • Card v. Southern Builders, Inc. 117 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Wherland v. Crowell Long Leaf Lumber Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 99 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
  • France v. City of New Orleans 92 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; Wherland v. Crowell Long Leaf Lumber Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., .
  • Holmes v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 91 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O’Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .” There are many other cases in our jurisprudence with the same holding.
  • Roy v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance 87 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    1 Cir., , at page 628; see, e. g., Zito v. Standard Accident Ins.
  • Roy v. Guillot 84 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    O'Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Sims v. Brown Paper Industries, Inc., La.
  • Zito v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 76 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De NeMours & Co., La.App., ; McCray v. Yarbrough, La.App., ; Verbois v. Standard Accident Co., La.App., ; Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., ; O'Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., ; Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., La.App., ; Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., .
  • Garrett v. Gaylord Container Corp. 71 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    See Franks v. Dept. of Highways for Louisiana, La.App., ; O’Connor v. American Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Rivero v. Leaveau 45 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit said:— "It is well settled in our jurisprudence that the protection accorded by the compensation Act of Louisiana against injury by accident comprehends and includes the giving way of affected parts of the body while at work, even though the disability was not the imme
  • Franks v. Department of Highways for Louisiana 43 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949