DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., 32 So. 2d 500.

17 citing documents.

  • Prejean v. Travelers Insurance Company 234 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    He has received medical expenses of only $1,720.16, being entitled under *529 certain conditions to the maximum of $2,500.00, Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; thus, only if the Workmen's Compensation Law limits the payment of medical expenses to a period of four hundred weeks, the maximum period for receiving total disability payments, can he be deprived of the medical expenses he seeks.
  • Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company 169 So. 2d 540 La. 1964
    He has received medical expenses of only $1,720.16, being entitled under certain conditions to the maximum of $2,500.00, Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; thus, only if the Workmen's Compensation Law limits the payment of medical expenses to a period of four hundred weeks, the maximum period for receiving total disability payments, can he be deprived of the medical expenses he seeks.
  • Brown v. Travelers Insurance 169 So. 2d 540 La. 1964
    He has received medical expenses of only $1,720.16, being entitled under certain conditions to the maximum of $2,500.00, Vau-trot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; thus, only if the Workmen’s Compensation Law limits the payment of medical expenses to a period of four hundred weeks, the maximum period for receiving total disability payments, can he be deprived of the medical expenses he seeks.
  • Seals v. Potlatch Forests, Inc. 151 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    1 Cir., (non-malignant tumor); Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App.Orl., ; Causey v. Kansas City Bridge Co., La.App.
  • Smith v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 116 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    "Since the Daigle case," so says Professor Malone, "the method for computing the credit described above has been consistently applied without modification," citing these authorities: Arbo v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hingle v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Bailey v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Goodman v. Hillyer, Deutsch, Edwards, Inc., La.App., .
  • Pixley v. Employers' Mutual Liability Insurance 102 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    1946, ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App.1947, ; Lacy v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, La.App.1956, .
  • Lacy v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin 86 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Lyons v. Swift & Company 86 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Co., La.App., , is a suit for compensation *621 for injuries sustained by plaintiff in the employ of the Aluminum Ore Company, defendant's insured.
  • Morrison v. Travelers Insurance Co. 79 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    See Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Godeaux v. Travelers Ins.
  • Zito v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 76 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    6 ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hibbard v. Blane, La.App., 183 So.
  • Johnson v. Cabot Carbon Co. 75 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    In our case, the evidence preponderates to the effect that plaintiff, within the purview o'f the compensation statute, was disabled from performing his former duties up to the collapse of the vertebra on September 7, -1944.” Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., 1947, .
  • Weeks v. Consolidated Underwriters 73 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Vaufsrot v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App.1947, ; Godeaux v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., 1952, ; nor does he forfeit his compensation by accepting employment in dissimilar work.
  • Stringer v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 66 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    The following authorities are cited as sustaining plaintiff’s right to recover herein: Johnson v. Brown Paper Mill Company, La.App., ; Christy v. Brown Paper Mill Company, La.App., ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Crier v. Kent Piling Co., La.App., ; Hayes v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Company, La.App., ; Lowery v. W. Horace Williams Co., La.App., ; York v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, La.App., ; Hil
  • Taylor v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. 65 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    730 ; Custer v. Higgin's Industries, Inc., La.App., 1946, ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., 1947, .
  • Godeaux v. Travelers Ins. Co. 58 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    As stated by this court in Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., , at page 503, "* * * It is now too well settled in our jurisprudence to even cite authorities that if a claimant can substantially do his duties only with pain and discomfort, he is entitled to compensation for his disability."
  • Hebert v. Fifteen Oil Co. 46 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    App., ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., .
  • Dilley v. Phillips Petroleum Co. 36 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1948