No. 29598.
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. Neeland
State v. Neeland, 119 So. 71 (La. 1928).
Cited by
- State Ex Rel. Superior Oil Co. v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 136 So. 2d 55 La. 1961
- State ex rel. Thalheim v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 107 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- State ex rel. Gill v. Soule 61 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
- Smith v. American National Ins. Co. 25 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- State Ex Rel. Brown v. United Gas Public Service Co. 2 So. 2d 41 La. 1941
- Giuffria v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 178 So. 368 La. 1937
- State Ex Rel. City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Highway Commission 156 So. 806 La. 1934
Opinion text
O’NIELL, C. J. The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for having intoxicating liquor in Ms possession for beverage purposes. There is no bill of exception in the record, nor assignment of error, nor error apparent on the face of the, record. It is quite likely that the appeal was taken merely to postpone payment of the penalty. The verdict and sentence are affirmed.