DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bordelon v. Heard, 33 So. 2d 88.

19 citing documents.

  • Richland Plantation, Inc. v. East Feliciana Parish 973 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Sylvester v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury 461 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    The trial court held that the grading of the road amounted to no more than a brushing up or a token maintenance, (La.App.
  • Robinson v. Beauregard Parish Police Jury 342 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    4th Cir., 1972); (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Town of Logansport 322 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
  • Rowe v. Harvey 307 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Chargois v. St. Julien 280 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Martin v. Cheramie 264 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Bordelon v. Heard, La.App., (1947).
  • Distinguished Mouton v. Bourque 253 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    It was argued that this was not a (La.App.
  • Town of Eunice v. Childs 205 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    But through our disposition of the case, it becomes unnecessary to decide this issue or another issue as to whether or not the City of Eunice worked on this alley to such a , La.App.
  • Kansas City Southern Railroad v. City of Deridder 206 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Latour v. Dupuis 164 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    By reason of this circumstance, among others, the present case is distinguished from Bordelon v. Heard, La.App., 1 Cir., , relied upon by defendants-appellants, where the road was held not to have *624 been dedicated when it had been graded by public equipment just `on a few occasions', , many years before the suit."
  • Le Boeuf v. Roux 125 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    988 , ; Bordelon v. Heard, La.App., 1 Cir., .
  • Champagne v. Bourque 117 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1959
    In Bordelon v. Heard, La.App., , this Court said: “We doubt very seriously however that that part of the so-called road extending from that point to the rear of defendant’s present property was worked, kept up and maintained by the police jury as it did the rest of it which was part of the old public dirt road.
  • Curtis v. Goebel 101 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    1 Cir., , relied upon by defendants-appellants, where the road was held not to have been dedicated when it had been graded by public equipment just "on a few occasions", , many years before the suit.
  • Harris v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 99 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    The defendant relies strongly upon Bordelon v. Heard, La.App.1947, , a decision by Judge Le Blanc of the First Circuit Court of Appeal.
  • White v. Kinchem 94 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    The defendant relies on the case of Bordelon v. Heard, La.App., .
  • Distinguished Porter v. Huckabay 58 So. 2d 731 La. 1952
    App., , relied on by the lower courts in reaching an opposite conclusion, is plainly distinguishable on the facts.
  • Porter v. Huckabay 50 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    We quote from his decision: “In the case of Bordelon v. Heard [La.App.], , the court said: “ ‘The parish road grader when being used in that area, graded it on a few occasions.
  • Bonnabel v. Police Jury 44 So. 2d 872 La. 1950
    368 and Bordelon v. Heard, La.App., .