Palmisano & Palmisano v. Bonner
Palmisano & Palmisano v. Bonner, 120 So. 630 (La. 1929).
Cited by
- Townsend v. Graham 108 So. 2d 103 La. 1959
- Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Parker 84 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Officer v. American Ins. Co. 162 So. 771 La. 1935
- Loudan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 161 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Fischer v. Palmisano's Succession 147 So. 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Bass v. Lane 125 So. 853 La. 1930
- Gardiner v. Erskine 127 So. 604 La. 1929
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Wheeler v. Peterkin 38 La. Ann. 663
- Smith v. O'Reilly Elevator Co. 134 La. 635
- King v. First Methodist Church 137 La. 879
- McGaw v. O'Bierne 124 La. 989
- Gagneaux v. Desonier 109 La. 460
- A. J. Trounstine & Co. v. Ware 39 La. Ann. 939
- 3 So. 122 not in our corpus
Opinion text
*1015 LAND, J. Plaintiff’s suit was dismissed by judgment rendered in the lower court May-27, 1927, and signed in open court June 6, 1927, maintaining an exception'of no cause of action, filed May 9, 1927, by defendant the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. Under section 1 of Rule IY of the civil district court, the term of court begins October 15th of each calendar year, and is opened for the transaction of all business until its adjournment July 31st following. On June 1, 1928, at a subsequent term of the civil district court, plaintiff filed a motion for a devolutive appeal from this judgment, which was granted on the same day, and < made returnable to this court on July 20, 1928. It appears from this motion that no citation was prayed for, or was ordered in the order granting the appeal, nor was any citation issued, as far as the record discloses. Under this state of facts, the motion to dismiss must prevail. “The omission of appellant to ask for citation of appeal and to have it served on appellee, when the order of appeal has been granted on motion in open court at a term different from that on which the judgment was rendered, is fatal to the appeal which must be dismissed.” Wheeler & Pierson v. G. A. Peterkin et al., 38 La. Ann. 663 ; Smith v. O’Reilly Elevator Co., 134 La. 635 , 64 So. 494 ; King et al. v. First Methodist Church, 137 La. 879 , 69 So. 593 . As stated in Smith v. O’Reilly Elevator Case, above cited: “It is well settled that, when an appeal is taken at a subsequent term, the appellee must be cited. McGaw v. O’Bierne, 124 La. 989 , 50 So. 819 ; Gagneaux v. Desonier, 109 La. 460 , 33 So. 561 ; Wheeler & Pierson v. Peterkin et al., 38 La. Ann. 663 ; Trouston [Trounstine] & Co. v. Ware & Munn, 39 La. Ann. 939 , 3 So. 122 .” It is therefore ordered that the motion be maintained, and that the appeal be dismissed.