Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meraux & Nunez, Inc. v. Gaidry, 132 So. 401.

18 citing documents.

  • Garnett v. Battistella 485 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    art. 3498 (1870); Meraux & , 132 So.
  • Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc. v. De Felice 98 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
  • Benedict v. Lynch 81 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    On the issue of damages the district judge correctly disallowed plaintiff’s claims for attorney’s fees on the authority of Miller v. Welch, La.App., , and Meraux & , 132 So.
  • Miller v. Welsh 66 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
  • Finch v. Schexnayder 53 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    461 ; Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
  • Matthews v. Gaubler 49 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    23 ; Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
  • Smith v. Atkins 48 So. 2d 101 La. 1950
    Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
  • Efner v. Ketteringham 47 So. 2d 331 La. 1950
  • Rhodes v. Collier 41 So. 2d 669 La. 1949
    Meraux & Nunez, , 132 So.
  • Dupuy v. Joly 200 So. 806 La. 1941
    27 , the Court, citing Meraux & , 132 So.
  • City of Shreveport v. Kahn 193 So. 461 La. 1939
    Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
  • Sherburne v. Iberville Land Co. 190 So. 227 La. 1939
    207 ; Meraux & , 132 So.
  • Johnson v. Henderson 190 So. 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    357 ; Meraux & , 132 So.
  • Hoyt v. Smith 187 So. 87 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
    Meraux & Nunez, Inc. v. Gaidry, et al., , 132 So.
  • Garner v. Sims 185 So. 27 La. 1938
    reads: “Good faith is always presumed in matters of prescription; and he who alleges bad faith in the possessor, must prove it.” In the case of Meraux & , 132 So.
  • Bell v. Leiendecker 180 So. 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Attorney’s fees, as damages, are not ordinarily allowed (Meraux & , 132 So.
  • Moran v. Simonin 148 So. 677 La. 1933
    Meraux & Nunez, Inc. v. Gaidry et al.; , 132 So.
  • Marsland v. Hundley 140 So. 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
    After holding that there had been no wantonness or maliciousness shown, the court stated: “But at any rate, there is neither law nor jurisprudence in this state which allows a defendant to recover attorney’s fees for defending a civil suit.” In Meraux & , 132 So.