Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meraux & Nunez, Inc. v. Gaidry, 132 So. 401.
-
Garnett v. Battistella
485 So. 2d 929
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
art. 3498 (1870); Meraux & , 132 So.
-
Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc. v. De Felice
98 So. 2d 314
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
-
Benedict v. Lynch
81 So. 2d 91
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
On the issue of damages the district judge correctly disallowed plaintiff’s claims for attorney’s fees on the authority of Miller v. Welch, La.App., , and Meraux & , 132 So.
- Miller v. Welsh 66 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
-
Finch v. Schexnayder
53 So. 2d 484
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
461 ; Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
-
Matthews v. Gaubler
49 So. 2d 774
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
23 ; Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
-
Smith v. Atkins
48 So. 2d 101
La. 1950
Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
- Efner v. Ketteringham 47 So. 2d 331 La. 1950
-
Rhodes v. Collier
41 So. 2d 669
La. 1949
Meraux & Nunez, , 132 So.
-
Dupuy v. Joly
200 So. 806
La. 1941
27 , the Court, citing Meraux & , 132 So.
-
City of Shreveport v. Kahn
193 So. 461
La. 1939
Meraux & Nunez, Inc., v. Gaidry, , 132 So.
-
Sherburne v. Iberville Land Co.
190 So. 227
La. 1939
207 ; Meraux & , 132 So.
-
Johnson v. Henderson
190 So. 171
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
357 ; Meraux & , 132 So.
-
Hoyt v. Smith
187 So. 87
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
Meraux & Nunez, Inc. v. Gaidry, et al., , 132 So.
-
Garner v. Sims
185 So. 27
La. 1938
reads: “Good faith is always presumed in matters of prescription; and he who alleges bad faith in the possessor, must prove it.” In the case of Meraux & , 132 So.
-
Bell v. Leiendecker
180 So. 846
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Attorney’s fees, as damages, are not ordinarily allowed (Meraux & , 132 So.
-
Moran v. Simonin
148 So. 677
La. 1933
Meraux & Nunez, Inc. v. Gaidry et al.; , 132 So.
-
Marsland v. Hundley
140 So. 45
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
After holding that there had been no wantonness or maliciousness shown, the court stated: “But at any rate, there is neither law nor jurisprudence in this state which allows a defendant to recover attorney’s fees for defending a civil suit.” In Meraux & , 132 So.