Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Daily States Pub. Co. v. Uhalt, 126 So. 228.

34 citing documents.

Lynn Marie Sorola Curtis v. Lawrence N. Curtis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Curtis v. Curtis 969 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
5, 19 , (1972), , 126 So.
Gregory Kent Moroux v. Andre F. Toce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Moroux v. Toce 943 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5, 19 , (1972), , 126 So.
Coffee Bay Investors v. Wogc Co. 878 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
5, 19 , (1972), , 126 So.
Arcement Boat Rentals, Inc. v. Good 820 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. 528 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Florida Universal Financial Corp. v. Cox 493 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Jones v. Crescent City Health & Racquetball Club 489 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. McNamara 452 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. McNamara 452 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Equitable Petroleum v. Cent. Transmission 431 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Josephs v. Austin 420 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Buckbee on Behalf of Buckbee v. Aweco, Inc. 418 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Daigre Engineers, Inc. v. City of Winnfield 385 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
HMC MANAGEMENT v. New Orleans Basketball Club 375 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
The trial judge found specific performance of the lease was not available to plaintiffs because (1) the contract containing that remedy had been superceded and (2) as a legal proposition, the Courts do not issue injunctive relief for specific performance to enforce contracts of lease, , 126 So.
Marine Services, Inc. v. A-1 INDUSTRIES 355 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Cookmeyer v. Cookmeyer 274 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Caston v. Woman's Hospital Foundation, Inc. 262 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Duncan v. Gill 227 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The court there stated at pages 784-785: “We are clear in the opinion that defendants and DeSoto, in drilling the second well, engaged in a joint adventure within the definition of that term as announced in Daily States Publishing Company, , 126 So.
Prentice v. Amax Petroleum Corp. 187 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
B & R Construction Co. v. Duvigneaud 172 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Villarrubia v. Roy 162 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Hayes v. Muller 158 So. 2d 191 La. 1963
Penn v. Burk 152 So. 2d 16 La. 1963
Fossier v. American Printing Co., Ltd. 130 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Guyot v. Labat 126 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Williamson v. Roberts 103 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
298 ; Daily States Publishing Company v. Uhalt, 1930, , 126 So.
Illinois Central Railroad v. Pope Construction Co. 90 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Winsberg v. Winsberg 87 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1956
Harding v. Wattigney 62 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
264 , , and Daily States Publishing Co., , 126 So.
Kennedy v. Perry Timber Co. 52 So. 2d 847 La. 1951
McCann v. Todd 14 So. 2d 469 La. 1943
Young v. Reed 192 So. 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
We are clear in the opinion that defendants and DeSoto, in drilling the second well, engaged in a joint adventure within the definition of that term as announced in Daily States Publishing Company, Limited, v. Uhalt, , 126 So.