DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mathews Bros. v. Bernius, 126 So. 556.

36 citing documents.

  • James M. Vardaman & Co., Inc. v. Ponder 443 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Gertrude Gardner, Inc. v. Campo 411 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Schackai v. Lagreco 350 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    The broker, in such a case, in the absence of notice to the contrary, has the right to act upon the assumption that his principal has a marketable title.” , 126 So.
  • Bob Burke, Inc. v. Fleniken 346 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Strahan v. Weiland 216 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Olympic Homes, Inc. v. Ory 207 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Loubat v. Audubon Life Insurance Company 177 So. 2d 281 La. 1965
  • Werner, McShan & Robertson, Inc. v. Bonnette 160 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    811 , ; Cox v. Green, La.App., ; Doll v. Russo, La.App., ; Caruso-Goll v. D’Alfonso, La.App., ; , 126 So.
  • Clesi, Inc. v. Quaglino 137 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    App., ; Leaman v. Rauschkolb, La.App., ; , 126 So.
  • Chaney v. Whitney 107 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Treadaway v. Amundson 88 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Rouchon v. Rocamora 84 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    The case which plaintiff cites, , 126 So.
  • Cox v. Green 70 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    “The views expressed by the Courts of Appeal in the above cited cases were subsequently approved in the year 1930 , 126 So.
  • Walker v. Moore 68 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Appellee, on the other hand, relies principally upon the ruling in the case of Mathews Bros. v. Bernius, 1930, -1070, 126 So.
  • Nelson v. Holden 52 So. 2d 240 La. 1951
  • Accounts Supervision Co. v. Mathews 50 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    The acts in question have been interpreted to this effect by a number of cases, , 126 So.
  • Cotter v. Figaro 36 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    "The views expressed by the Courts of Appeal in the above cited cases were subsequently approved in the year 1930 , 1070, 126 So.
  • Neal v. Halliburton 19 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
  • Doll v. Russo 7 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • Veazey v. Rogers 6 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • Leaman v. Rauschkolb 1 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    The views expressed by the Courts of Appeal in the above cited cases were subsequently approved in the year 1930 , 1070, 126 So.
  • Caruso-Goll v. D'Alfonso 1 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
  • Leaman v. Rauschkolb. 199 So. 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    The broker, in such a case, in the absence of notice to the contrary, has the right to act upon the assumption that his principal has a marketable title.” , 126 So.
  • Harvey v. Sims 198 So. 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
  • Guy L. Deano, Inc. v. Michel 185 So. 9 La. 1938
    accepted in writing by Michel, whose acceptance contained the following agreement relative to the commission of the real estate agent: “I * * * agree to pay the commission of Guy L. Deano, Inc., the amount of Three Hundred and Forty Dollars ($340.00), which is earned upon acceptance of this offer, irrespective of validity of the title.” , 126 So.
  • C. I. T. Corporation v. Lytle 185 So. 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
  • Guy L. Deano, Inc. v. Michel 181 So. 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Plaintiff relies upon the welí- , 126 So.
  • D. H. Holmes Co. v. Morris 177 So. 417 La. 1937
  • Spiro v. Corliss 174 So. 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
  • Spiro v. Corpora 174 So. 145 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1937
  • Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Calcasieu Real Estate & Oil Co. 170 So. 785 La. 1936
  • Wilson & Gandy, Inc. v. Cummings 150 So. 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    Under the provisions of these two acts, a married woman may bind herself for her husband’s debt, and, , 126 So.
  • United Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Haley 150 So. 833 La. 1933
    1075 , , viz.: “Generally speaking, Out excepting the right to contract with their husbands, married women have, under the Act of 1926, as much power to contract debts as if they were single, though not so as to bind the community, or interfere with the husband’s rights as head and master thereof.” Mrs. Haley’s attorney
  • Breeland v. Great States Ins. Co. 147 So. 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    1070 , ; Howard v. Cardella, 171 La.
  • Uchello v. Arnold 135 So. 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    1071 , , “the proper solution of the case depends upon 'whether a married women has the right to bind hex-self to pay commissions and attorney’s fees thereon, with the end in view of selling property, which she assumes, at the time to be her property, but which later developments disclose she is unable to convey title to, be
  • Howard v. Cardella 132 So. 501 La. 1931
    sly authorized “to bind and obligate herself personally or as surety for her husband or any other person.” And hence, “as she may bind herself for the benefit of her husband, who is by law the head and master of the community, and responsible for its debts, by reasonable implication she may bind herself for a debt of the community, for such a debt is the husband’s debt.” , 126 So.