DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Raceland Bank & Trust Co. v. Toups, 138 So. 652.

33 citing documents.

  • Booth v. AMBERG 993 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Id.; see Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Loupe v. Bybee 570 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    575 , (1943); Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Blanchard v. Fontana 434 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    575 , (1943); Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Thibaut v. Thibaut 407 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Kisatchie Investors, (2nd Cir. 1981); Tri-State Concrete Co., (2nd Cir. 1981); , 138 So.
  • Tri-State Concrete Co., Inc. v. Stephens 406 So. 2d 205 La. 1981
    575 , (1943); Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Kisatchie Investors, Inc. v. Broussard 397 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    575 , (1943); Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Tri-State Concrete Co., Inc. v. Stephens 395 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Hughes v. Heirs of Cain 268 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    In Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Noel v. Noel 244 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    art. 1289; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Crain v. Crain 206 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    This case of Dobrowolski v. Dobrowolski, supra, holds as follows: “We are of the opinion that the plaintiffs, co-owners in indivisión with the defendants of the property here sought to be partitioned and unwilling to continue such ownership in indivisión, have an absolute right to have this property partitioned, Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Murdock v. Cordova 180 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    545 ; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Taylor v. Bell 155 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    In Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Babineaux v. Babineaux 112 So. 2d 620 La. 1959
    Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Bordelon v. Sterkx 111 So. 2d 791 La. 1959
    In Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Savoie v. Chambers 62 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    545 ; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Lasyone v. Emerson 57 So. 2d 906 La. 1952
    784 ; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Lasyone v. Emerson 57 So. 2d 906 La. 1952
    784 ; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Walker v. Chapital 50 So. 2d 641 La. 1951
    545 and Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Welch v. Pitre 45 So. 2d 363 La. 1950
    545 ; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Dobrowolski v. Dobrowolski 42 So. 2d 760 La. 1949
    We are of the opinion that the plaintiffs, co-owners in indivision with the defendants of the property here sought to be partitioned and unwilling to continue such ownership in indivision, have an absolute right to have this property partitioned, Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Fabacher v. Fabacher 39 So. 2d 426 La. 1949
    ithin the province of the court to say when property shall be partitioned * * * ” and “When co-owners cannot agree upon a partition of the property which they own in common, a judicial partition becomes necessary, and if one of them demands it by suit, it then becomes the duty of the judge before whom the case is tried to determine the method of making it.” Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Pryor v. Desha 15 So. 2d 891 La. 1943
    Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Pryor v. Desha 15 So. 2d 891 La. 1943
  • Junkin v. Carraway 14 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
  • Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese 196 So. 558 La. 1940
    722 ; Raceland Bank & ; 138 So.
  • Thompson v. Mack 195 So. 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    545 ; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Lovell v. Dick 185 So. 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    See, also, Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Wyche v. Taylor 186 So. 602 La. 1939
    532 , — and repeated in Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Miller v. Murphy 174 So. 272 La. 1937
    383 , “parties who own property in common with an insane person [or minor] have the absolute right to put an end to the indivisión.” Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Mitcham v. Mitcham 173 So. 132 La. 1937
    Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Kelly v. Kelleher 171 So. 569 La. 1936
    This court, in the case of Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Jefferson Lake Oil Co. v. Loughridge 161 So. 19 La. 1935
    545 ; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.
  • Levy v. Levy 156 So. 181 La. 1934
    Code, art. 1367; Raceland Bank & , 138 So.