Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Woolfarth, 127 So. 376.

58 citing documents.

Gager v. Teche Transfer Co. 153 So. 69 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1934
95 , , the court said: “Our conclusion is that the doctrine of the Iiopkins-Spurlock and LeBlanc cases is correct in so far as these cases hold, that where a passenger is injured the burden of proof is on the carrier to show, that it was free from any negligence, which might have caused the accident ; but that the doctrine
Johnston v. City of Monroe 147 So. 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
95 , , which is, where the plaintiff proves that he was a passenger on a street car and that he fell from the steps of the car while alighting, the burden is on the defendant to prove itself free from fault.
Carter v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 146 So. 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
95 , ; Brandt v. New Orleans Public Service, 15 La.
Wylie v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 140 So. 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
95 , , in support of the doctrine that all a carrier has to do in eases of this kind is to disprove its own negligence and that it need not go further in its proof.
Mays v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. 140 So. 826 La. 1932
95 , , can be considered as controlling in this case, because it is well known that electricity of high voltage is an inherently dangerous agency.
Bacon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 137 So. 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
95 , ; Hopkins v. N. O. Ry.
Johnson v. Bisso Ferry Co. 127 So. 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Baptiste v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc. 127 So. 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930