Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. McCain, 132 So. 758.
- Young v. Tolintino 26 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
- Ward v. Pennington 434 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Webb v. Young 338 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
- Rodrigue v. Ziifle 288 So. 2d 630 La. 1974
- Lambert v. Succession of DeHass 271 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Bornemann v. Richards 161 So. 2d 741 La. 1964
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Younger 158 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
- Hymel v. Old Homestead Inc. 135 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
- Chicago Mill and Lumber Co. v. Ayer Timber Co. 131 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
- Bellestri v. Clark 119 So. 2d 836 La. 1960
- Scott v. Apgar 113 So. 2d 457 La. 1959
- Everhardt v. Sighinolfi 95 So. 2d 632 La. 1957
- Everhardt v. Sighinolfi 95 So. 2d 632 La. 1957
-
Board of Commissioners v. Bergeron
94 So. 2d 652
La. 1957
156 : ‘When a judgment has once been signed by the Judge, it should be interpreted by the court which rendered it, as well as by all others, as the foreign writers say, objectively; that is, it should be construed with reference to the pleadings and the subject matter of the controversy, according to the natural and legal import of the terms used.’ , 132 So.
- Stephens v. Bulkley 41 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
- Ober v. Williams 35 So. 2d 219 La. 1948
- Williams v. Williams 17 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
-
In Re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg. Co.
193 So. 468
La. 1939
156 : ‘When a judgment has once been signed by the Judge, it should be interpreted by the court which rendered it, as well as by all others, as the foreign writers say, objectively; that is, it should be construed with reference to the pleadings and the subject matter of the controversy, according to the natural and legal import of the terms used.’ , 132 So.
- Blunson v. Brocato 172 So. 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937